Denise Charron-Prochownik1, Janice C Zgibor2, Mark Peyrot3, Malinda Peeples4, Janis McWilliams5, Janice Koshinsky5, William Noullet2, Linda M Siminerio5. 1. The School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Charron-Prochownik) 2. Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Zgibor, Mr Noullet) 3. Sociology, Loyola College, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Peyrot) 4. American Association of Diabetes Educators, Chicago, Illinois (Ms Peeples) 5. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Ms McWilliams, Ms Koshinsky, Dr Siminerio)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to present the results of the process evaluation and patient experience in completing the Diabetes Self-management Assessment Report Tool (D-SMART), an instrument within the AADE Outcome System to assist diabetes educators to assess, facilitate, and track behavior change in the provision of diabetes self-management education (DSME). METHODS: The D-SMART was integrated into computer and telephonic systems at 5 sites within the Pittsburgh Regional Initiative for Diabetes Education (PRIDE) network. Data were obtained from 290 patients with diabetes using the system at these programs via paper-and-pencil questionnaires following baseline D-SMART assessments and electronic system measurement of system performance. Process evaluation included time of completion, understanding content, usability of technology, and satisfaction with the system. Patients were 58% female and 85% Caucasian and had a mean age of 58 years. Fifty-six percent of patients had no more than a high school education, and 78% had Internet access at home. RESULTS: Most patients reported completing the D-SMART at home (78%), in 1 attempt (86%) via the Internet (55%), and in less than 30 minutes. Seventy-six percent believed the questions were easy to understand, and 80% did not need assistance. Age was negatively associated with ease of use. Moreover, 76% of patients believed the D-SMART helped them think about their diabetes, with 67% indicating that it gave the diabetes educator good information about themselves and their diabetes. Most (94%) were satisfied with the D-SMART. Level of satisfaction was independent of the system being used. CONCLUSIONS: The D-SMART was easily completed at home in 1 attempt, content was understandable, and patients were generally satisfied with the wording of questions and selection of answers. The D-SMART is easy to use and enhanced communication between the patient and clinician; however, elderly patients may need more assistance. Computer-based and telephonic D-SMARTs appear to be feasible and useful assessment methods for diabetes educators.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to present the results of the process evaluation and patient experience in completing the Diabetes Self-management Assessment Report Tool (D-SMART), an instrument within the AADE Outcome System to assist diabetes educators to assess, facilitate, and track behavior change in the provision of diabetes self-management education (DSME). METHODS: The D-SMART was integrated into computer and telephonic systems at 5 sites within the Pittsburgh Regional Initiative for Diabetes Education (PRIDE) network. Data were obtained from 290 patients with diabetes using the system at these programs via paper-and-pencil questionnaires following baseline D-SMART assessments and electronic system measurement of system performance. Process evaluation included time of completion, understanding content, usability of technology, and satisfaction with the system. Patients were 58% female and 85% Caucasian and had a mean age of 58 years. Fifty-six percent of patients had no more than a high school education, and 78% had Internet access at home. RESULTS: Most patients reported completing the D-SMART at home (78%), in 1 attempt (86%) via the Internet (55%), and in less than 30 minutes. Seventy-six percent believed the questions were easy to understand, and 80% did not need assistance. Age was negatively associated with ease of use. Moreover, 76% of patients believed the D-SMART helped them think about their diabetes, with 67% indicating that it gave the diabetes educator good information about themselves and their diabetes. Most (94%) were satisfied with the D-SMART. Level of satisfaction was independent of the system being used. CONCLUSIONS: The D-SMART was easily completed at home in 1 attempt, content was understandable, and patients were generally satisfied with the wording of questions and selection of answers. The D-SMART is easy to use and enhanced communication between the patient and clinician; however, elderly patients may need more assistance. Computer-based and telephonic D-SMARTs appear to be feasible and useful assessment methods for diabetes educators.
Authors: Van Bang Nguyen; Kim Huong Pham Thi; Thi Xuan Nguyen; Nguyen Tuyen Linh Pham; Van Vy Hau Nguyen; Chi Van Le Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Mark Peyrot; Donald M Bushnell; Jennie H Best; Mona L Martin; Ann Cameron; Donald L Patrick Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Allah Bukhsh; Shaun Wen Huey Lee; Priyia Pusparajah; Andreas Schmitt; Tahir Mehmood Khan Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 3.186