PURPOSE: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are currently considered the same entity, but controversy remains over whether CLL and SLL should be treated similarly. We assessed whether characteristics of patients with CLL and SLL differ in ways other than the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and evaluated treatment outcomes and prognostic factors. METHODS: We searched the electronic database for patients with CLL or SLL who presented to The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) between 1985 and 2005. We reviewed patient records to determine presenting characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes. Cox models using training and validation sets of patients and resampling methods were used to develop a model predicting survival. RESULTS: Among 2,126 consecutive CLL/SLL patients, 312 (15%) had ALC less than 5 x 10(9)/L. Patients with ALC less than 5 x 10(9)/L had lower rates of cytogenetic abnormalities (P = .0002) and higher rates of CD38-positive results (P = .0002) and had mutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene status (P = .034). Rates of response, survival, and failure-free survival (FFS) were not different among ALC groups. Regimens that included rituximab and a nucleoside analog were associated with superior rates of response and FFS compared with other therapies, irrespective of ALC. Deletion 17p or 6q with or without other cytogenetic abnormalities, age at least 60 years, beta2-microglobulin at least 2 mg/L, albumin less than 3.5 g/dL, and creatinine at least 1.6 mg/dL were each found to independently predict shorter survival and formed the basis of a scoring system. CONCLUSION: Patients with CLL or SLL can be treated similarly. A new prognostic score is proposed.
PURPOSE:Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are currently considered the same entity, but controversy remains over whether CLL and SLL should be treated similarly. We assessed whether characteristics of patients with CLL and SLL differ in ways other than the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and evaluated treatment outcomes and prognostic factors. METHODS: We searched the electronic database for patients with CLL or SLL who presented to The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) between 1985 and 2005. We reviewed patient records to determine presenting characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes. Cox models using training and validation sets of patients and resampling methods were used to develop a model predicting survival. RESULTS: Among 2,126 consecutive CLL/SLL patients, 312 (15%) had ALC less than 5 x 10(9)/L. Patients with ALC less than 5 x 10(9)/L had lower rates of cytogenetic abnormalities (P = .0002) and higher rates of CD38-positive results (P = .0002) and had mutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region gene status (P = .034). Rates of response, survival, and failure-free survival (FFS) were not different among ALC groups. Regimens that included rituximab and a nucleoside analog were associated with superior rates of response and FFS compared with other therapies, irrespective of ALC. Deletion 17p or 6q with or without other cytogenetic abnormalities, age at least 60 years, beta2-microglobulin at least 2 mg/L, albumin less than 3.5 g/dL, and creatinine at least 1.6 mg/dL were each found to independently predict shorter survival and formed the basis of a scoring system. CONCLUSION:Patients with CLL or SLL can be treated similarly. A new prognostic score is proposed.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Neil E Kay; Kari G Rabe; David J Inwards; Clive S Zent; Jose F Leis; Susan M Schwager; Carrie A Thompson; Deborah A Bowen; Thomas E Witzig; Susan L Slager; Timothy G Call Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Julie E Chang; Thomas Havighurst; KyungMann Kim; Jens Eickhoff; Anne M Traynor; Rachel Kirby-Slimp; Lynn M Volk; Jae Werndli; Ronald S Go; Matthias Weiss; Jules Blank; Brad S Kahl Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Lingzhi Zhang; Fiona Murray; Laura Z Rassenti; Minya Pu; Colleen Kelly; Joan R Kanter; Andrew Greaves; Karen Messer; Thomas J Kipps; Paul A Insel Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Philip A Thompson; Francesco Stingo; Michael J Keating; William G Wierda; Susan M O'Brien; Zeev Estrov; Celina Ledesma; Katayoun Rezvani; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Nina Shah; Simrit Parmar; Uday Popat; Paolo Anderlini; Nieto Yago; Stefan O Ciurea; Partow Kebriaei; Richard Champlin; Elizabeth J Shpall; Chitra M Hosing Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Andrew D Zelenetz; Leo I Gordon; William G Wierda; Jeremy S Abramson; Ranjana H Advani; C Babis Andreadis; Nancy Bartlett; John C Byrd; Myron S Czuczman; Luis E Fayad; Richard I Fisher; Martha J Glenn; Thomas M Habermann; Nancy Lee Harris; Richard T Hoppe; Steven M Horwitz; Christopher R Kelsey; Youn H Kim; Susan Krivacic; Ann S LaCasce; Auayporn Nademanee; Pierluigi Porcu; Oliver Press; Rachel Rabinovitch; Nishitha Reddy; Erin Reid; Ayman A Saad; Lubomir Sokol; Lode J Swinnen; Christina Tsien; Julie M Vose; Lynn Wilson; Joachim Yahalom; Nadeem Zafar; Mary Dwyer; Hema Sundar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Andrew M Evens; Kevin A David; Irene Helenowski; Beverly Nelson; Dixon Kaufman; Sheetal M Kircher; Alla Gimelfarb; Elise Hattersley; Lauren A Mauro; Borko Jovanovic; Amy Chadburn; Patrick Stiff; Jane N Winter; Jayesh Mehta; Koen Van Besien; Stephanie Gregory; Leo I Gordon; Jamile M Shammo; Scott E Smith; Sonali M Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou; Sijin Wen; Peter McLaughlin; Susan O'Brien; William G Wierda; Susan Lerner; Sara Strom; Emil J Freireich; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Hagop M Kantarjian; Michael J Keating Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou; Constantine Tam; Lynne V Abruzzo; Susan O'Brien; William G Wierda; Susan Lerner; Hagop M Kantarjian; Michael J Keating Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860