Literature DB >> 17925496

Sensitivity of patient outcomes to pharmacist interventions. Part II: Systematic review and meta-analysis in hypertension management.

Márcio Machado1, Jana Bajcar, Giovanni C Guzzo, Thomas R Einarson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a major health concern worldwide due to its deleterious impact. Few studies have quantitatively assessed pharmacists' interventions in hypertensive patients.
OBJECTIVES: To identify and quantify outcomes sensitive to pharmacists' interventions.
METHODS: International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and EMBASE were searched from inception through December 2006. Two independent reviewers identified articles; results were compared and resolved through consensus. Data extracted included intervention type, patient numbers, demographics, study characteristics, instruments used, data compared, and outcomes reported. A random effects meta-analysis was used to combine data. Study quality was assessed using the Downs-Black scale.
RESULTS: Of 203 potential articles identified, 98 were selected and their abstracts were read. Nine of these were reviewed full-text and 19 more were identified from references, resulting in a total of 28 articles. Research designs included 18 randomized controlled trials, 6 single-arm clinical trials, 3 nonrandomized comparative trials, and 1 database study. Average quality score was 66% +/- 12% (fair). Medication management (82%) and hypertension education (68%) were the interventions most used. Thirty-nine study results (57% of all outcomes evaluated) were sensitive to pharmacists' interventions. Meta-analysis of 2246 patients in 13 studies found that pharmacists' interventions significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (10.7 +/- 11.6 mm Hg; p = 0.002), while controls remained unchanged (3.2 +/- 12.1 mm Hg; p = 0.361). Pharmacists' interventions further reduced systolic blood pressure (6.9 +/- 12.1 mm Hg; p = 0.047) over controls. Nonsensitive results included further reduction in diastolic blood pressure (3.6 +/- 3.7 mm Hg; p = 0.06), quality of life (1 of 8 significant), and adherence (5 of 13 significant).
CONCLUSIONS: Systolic blood pressure is sensitive to pharmacists' interventions. Other outcomes may also be sensitive; however, more high-quality studies are needed for a comprehensive quantitative assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17925496     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1K311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  74 in total

Review 1.  An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Melchiors; Cassyano Januário Correr; Rafael Venson; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-12-20

Review 2.  Review of services provided by pharmacies that promote healthy living.

Authors:  David Brown; Jane Portlock; Paul Rutter
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2012-04-17

3.  Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in undergraduate and graduate entry programs.

Authors:  Lorraine Smith; Ines Krass; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Clinical pharmacists and basic scientists: do patients and physicians need this collaboration?

Authors:  Amir H Zargarzadeh; Susan Jacob; Roger S Klotz; Fadi T Khasawneh
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-12

5.  The Role of Team-Based Care Involving Pharmacists to Improve Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes.

Authors:  Lauren Odum; Adam Whaley-Connell
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Cost analysis for the implementation of a medication review with follow-up service in Spain.

Authors:  Aranzazu Noain; Victoria Garcia-Cardenas; Miguel Angel Gastelurrutia; Amaia Malet-Larrea; Fernando Martinez-Martinez; Daniel Sabater-Hernandez; Shalom I Benrimoj
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-04-22

7.  Role of clinical pharmacist in the management of blood pressure in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Bonyan Qudah; Abla Albsoul-Younes; Ezat Alawa; Nabil Mehyar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-05-18

8.  Reasons for and time to discontinuation of rimonabant therapy: a modified prescription-event monitoring study.

Authors:  Marjolein J C Willemen; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Yvonne Buggy; Deborah Layton; Sabine M J M Straus; Hubert G M Leufkens; Toine C G Egberts
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  The preventing recurrent vascular events and neurological worsening through intensive organized case-management (PREVENTION) trial protocol [clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00931788].

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Sumit R Majumdar; Rajdeep S Padwal; Miriam Fradette; Ann Thompson; Ross Tsuyuki; Steven A Grover; Naeem Dean; Ashfaq Shuaib
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Engaging community pharmacists in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: protocol for the Pharmacist Assessment of Adherence, Risk and Treatment in Cardiovascular Disease (PAART CVD) pilot study.

Authors:  Kevin P Mc Namara; Johnson George; Sharleen L O'Reilly; Shane L Jackson; Gregory M Peterson; Helen Howarth; Michael J Bailey; Gregory Duncan; Peta Trinder; Elizabeth Morabito; Jill Finch; Stephen Bunker; Edward Janus; Jon Emery; James A Dunbar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.