BACKGROUND: COPD is associated with increased numbers of CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes and macrophages in the small airways and lung parenchyma. The chemokines regulating T-cell recruitment into the lung are unknown but may involve CXCR3 and CCR5 chemoattractants. The aims of this study were to determine the concentrations of CXCR3 chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and the CCR5 chemokine CCL5 in induced sputum from patients with COPD, smokers, and nonsmokers, and to examine the relationship between chemokine expression, inflammatory cells, and airway obstruction. METHODS: Differential cell counts were performed and concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 were measured in induced sputum from nonsmokers (n = 18), smokers (n = 20), and COPD patients (n = 35) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 were significantly increased in the sputum of patients with COPD when compared with nonsmokers but not smokers without obstruction: CXCL9 (median, 14.3 pg/mL; interquartile range [IQR], 6.5 to 99.3; vs median, 1.4 pg/mL; IQR, 0 to 10.4 [p < 0.001]; vs 8.5 pg/mL; IQR, 0 to 16.0, respectively); CXCL10 (16.9 pg/mL; IQR, 6.2 to 148.8; vs 3.7 pg/mL; IQR, 0 to 18.8 [p < 0.05]; vs 11.3 pg/mL; IQR, 3.7 to 46.7); CXCL11 (58.1 pg/mL; IQR, 34.5 to 85.3; vs 33.5 pg/mL; IQR, 23.2 to 49.7 [p < 0.05]; vs 49.8 pg/mL; IQR, 32.6 to 105.6); and CCL5 (59.9 pg/mL; IQR, 57.1 to 67.8; vs 33.5 pg/mL; IQR, 31.6 to 36.9 [p < 0.001]). CCL5 in sputum from smokers was also significantly increased compared with that from nonsmokers (median, 63.0 pg/mL; IQR, 60.8 to70.2; p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between FEV(1) percentage of predicted, FEV(1)/FVC ratio, and percentage of macrophages, and all the chemokines analyzed. Neutrophil numbers correlated positively with the concentrations of chemokines. CONCLUSIONS: CXCR3 chemokines and CCL5 are increased in sputum from COPD patients compared with nonsmokers, and may be important in COPD pathogenesis.
BACKGROUND:COPD is associated with increased numbers of CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes and macrophages in the small airways and lung parenchyma. The chemokines regulating T-cell recruitment into the lung are unknown but may involve CXCR3 and CCR5 chemoattractants. The aims of this study were to determine the concentrations of CXCR3 chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and the CCR5 chemokine CCL5 in induced sputum from patients with COPD, smokers, and nonsmokers, and to examine the relationship between chemokine expression, inflammatory cells, and airway obstruction. METHODS: Differential cell counts were performed and concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 were measured in induced sputum from nonsmokers (n = 18), smokers (n = 20), and COPDpatients (n = 35) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 were significantly increased in the sputum of patients with COPD when compared with nonsmokers but not smokers without obstruction: CXCL9 (median, 14.3 pg/mL; interquartile range [IQR], 6.5 to 99.3; vs median, 1.4 pg/mL; IQR, 0 to 10.4 [p < 0.001]; vs 8.5 pg/mL; IQR, 0 to 16.0, respectively); CXCL10 (16.9 pg/mL; IQR, 6.2 to 148.8; vs 3.7 pg/mL; IQR, 0 to 18.8 [p < 0.05]; vs 11.3 pg/mL; IQR, 3.7 to 46.7); CXCL11 (58.1 pg/mL; IQR, 34.5 to 85.3; vs 33.5 pg/mL; IQR, 23.2 to 49.7 [p < 0.05]; vs 49.8 pg/mL; IQR, 32.6 to 105.6); and CCL5 (59.9 pg/mL; IQR, 57.1 to 67.8; vs 33.5 pg/mL; IQR, 31.6 to 36.9 [p < 0.001]). CCL5 in sputum from smokers was also significantly increased compared with that from nonsmokers (median, 63.0 pg/mL; IQR, 60.8 to70.2; p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between FEV(1) percentage of predicted, FEV(1)/FVC ratio, and percentage of macrophages, and all the chemokines analyzed. Neutrophil numbers correlated positively with the concentrations of chemokines. CONCLUSIONS:CXCR3 chemokines and CCL5 are increased in sputum from COPDpatients compared with nonsmokers, and may be important in COPD pathogenesis.
Authors: Matthias Clauss; Robert Voswinckel; Gangaraju Rajashekhar; Ninotchka L Sigua; Heinz Fehrenbach; Natalia I Rush; Kelly S Schweitzer; Ali Ö Yildirim; Krzysztof Kamocki; Amanda J Fisher; Yuan Gu; Bilal Safadi; Sandeep Nikam; Walter C Hubbard; Rubin M Tuder; Homer L Twigg; Robert G Presson; Sanjay Sethi; Irina Petrache Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Meghan E Fitzpatrick; John R Tedrow; Maria E Hillenbrand; Lorrie Lucht; Thomas Richards; Karen A Norris; Yingze Zhang; Frank C Sciurba; Naftali Kaminski; Alison Morris Journal: Microbiol Immunol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 1.955
Authors: Jeffrey E Gotts; Lauren Chun; Jason Abbott; Xiaohui Fang; Naoki Takasaka; Stephen L Nishimura; Matthew L Springer; Suzaynn F Schick; Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Jennifer K Quint; Gavin C Donaldson; James J P Goldring; Ramin Baghai-Ravary; John R Hurst; Jadwiga A Wedzicha Journal: Chest Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Steven G Kelsen; Mark O Aksoy; Mary Georgy; Richard Hershman; Rong Ji; Xiuxia Li; Matthew Hurford; Charalambos Solomides; Wissam Chatila; Victor Kim Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 21.405