Literature DB >> 17924278

Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall.

Alistair J Harvey1, C Philip Beaman.   

Abstract

In immediate recall tasks, visual recency is substantially enhanced when output interference is low (Cowan, Saults, Elliott, & Moreno, 2002; Craik, 1969) whereas auditory recency remains high even under conditions of high output interference. This auditory advantage has been interpreted in terms of auditory resistance to output interference (e.g., Neath & Surprenant, 2003). In this study the auditory-visual difference at low output interference re-emerged when ceiling effects were accounted for, but only with spoken output. With written responding the auditory advantage remained significantly larger with high than with low output interference. These new data suggest that both superior auditory encoding and modality-specific output interference contribute to the classic auditory-visual modality effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924278     DOI: 10.1080/09658210701644677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  8 in total

1.  Does response mode affect amount recalled or the magnitude of the testing effect?

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

2.  Interpreting potential markers of storage and rehearsal: Implications for studies of verbal short-term memory and neuropsychological cases.

Authors:  Xiaoli Wang; Robert H Logie; Christopher Jarrold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-08

3.  Does neighborhood size really cause the word length effect?

Authors:  Dominic Guitard; Jean Saint-Aubin; Gerald Tehan; Anne Tolan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

4.  Two Modality Effects in Verbal Short-Term Memory: Evidence from Sentence Recall.

Authors:  Ralf Rummer; Judith Schweppe; Randi C Martin
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-05-01

5.  Common modality effects in immediate free recall and immediate serial recall.

Authors:  Rachel Grenfell-Essam; Geoff Ward; Lydia Tan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Assessing Boundary Conditions of the Testing Effect: On the Relative Efficacy of Covert vs. Overt Retrieval.

Authors:  Max L Sundqvist; Timo Mäntylä; Fredrik U Jönsson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-21

7.  Similar digit-based working memory in deaf signers and hearing non-signers despite digit span differences.

Authors:  Josefine Andin; Eleni Orfanidou; Velia Cardin; Emil Holmer; Cheryl M Capek; Bencie Woll; Jerker Rönnberg; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-16

8.  Intonation does aid serial recall after all.

Authors:  Michelina Savino; Bodo Winter; Andrea Bosco; Martine Grice
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.