Literature DB >> 17923550

Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.

Ya Xing Wang1, Liang Xu, Rong Xiu Zhang, Jost B Jonas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of frequency-doubling threshold perimetry for glaucoma in a population-based study.
METHODS: The Beijing Eye Study, a population-based study on subjects 40 years or older, included an ophthalmic examination with fundus photography and frequency-doubling threshold perimetry. Glaucoma was defined by a glaucomatous optic disc appearance.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 4349 subjects (8615 eyes). Among 207 glaucomatous eyes (2.4%), 74 (35.7%) did not show any abnormality on frequency-doubling threshold perimetry, suggesting a diagnostic sensitivity of 64.3%. In the total study population, a visual field defect was found in 905 eyes (10.5%). In 133 (14.7%) of these eyes, a glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc was detected, and 772 eyes (85.3%) had a nonglaucomatous optic disc appearance (either normal or with nonglaucomatous optic nerve damage, retinal disease, corneal disease, or cataract). For 450 eyes (49.7%) with a visual field defect, the cause of the perimetric defect was not detected.
CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based study, frequency-doubling threshold perimetry has a sensitivity of about 64% to detect glaucoma. If the result is abnormal, the probability of glaucoma is about 15%. When results of frequency-doubling threshold perimetry are abnormal, the cause of the visual field defect may not be detectable in 50% of subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17923550     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.125.10.1402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  6 in total

1.  Population and high-risk group screening for glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Brian A Francis; Rohit Varma; Cheryl Vigen; Mei-Ying Lai; Jonathan Winarko; Betsy Nguyen; Stanley Azen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Gaps in Glaucoma care: A systematic review of monoscopic disc photos to screen for glaucoma.

Authors:  Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Angela J Verkade; Gale Oren; Alan L Robin
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12

3.  Risk factors for glaucoma are reflected in abnormal responses to frequency-doubling technology screening in both normal and glaucoma eyes.

Authors:  Aiko Iwase; Tae Tsutsumi; Makoto Fujii; Shoichi Sawaguchi; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Five year incidence of visual field loss in adult Chinese. The Beijing Eye Study.

Authors:  Ya Xing Wang; Liang Xu; Xiu Ying Sun; Yang Zou; Hai Tao Zhang; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  FDT Perimetry for Glaucoma Detection in Comprehensive Health Checkup Service.

Authors:  Ryo Terauchi; Takashi Wada; Shumpei Ogawa; Masanobu Kaji; Tomohiro Kato; Masayuki Tatemichi; Tadashi Nakano
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Developing the specifications of an open angle glaucoma screening intervention in the United Kingdom: a Delphi approach.

Authors:  Susan E Campbell; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Marion K Campbell; Jillian J Francis; Alexandra C Greene; Craig R Ramsay; Jennifer M Burr
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.