Literature DB >> 17923144

Observers are consistent when rating image conspicuity.

Moran Cerf1, Daniel R Cleary, Robert J Peters, Wolfgang Einhäuser, Christof Koch.   

Abstract

Human perception of an image's conspicuity depends on the stimulus itself and the observer's semantic interpretation. We investigated the relative contribution of the former, sensory-driven, component. Participants viewed sequences of images from five different classes-fractals, overhead satellite imagery, grayscale and colored natural scenes, and magazine covers-and graded each numerically according to its perceived conspicuity. We found significant consistency in this rating within and between observers for all image categories. In a subsequent recognition memory test, performance was significantly above chance for all categories, with the weakest memory for satellite imagery, and reaching near ceiling for magazine covers. When repeating the experiment after one year, ratings remained consistent within each observer and category, despite the absence of explicit scene memory. Our findings suggest that the rating of image conspicuity is driven by image-immanent, sensory factors common to all observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17923144     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  The attraction of visual attention to texts in real-world scenes.

Authors:  Hsueh-Cheng Wang; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Neural correlates of exemplar novelty processing under different spatial attention conditions.

Authors:  Christian Michael Stoppel; Carsten Nicolas Boehler; Hendrik Strumpf; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jens Max Hopf; Emrah Düzel; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Everyone knows what is interesting: salient locations which should be fixated.

Authors:  Christopher Michael Masciocchi; Stefan Mihalas; Derrick Parkhurst; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Emotional effects of dynamic textures.

Authors:  Alexander Toet; Menno Henselmans; Marcel P Lucassen; Theo Gevers
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-11-24

5.  Seeing shapes in seemingly random spatial patterns: Fractal analysis of Rorschach inkblots.

Authors:  R P Taylor; T P Martin; R D Montgomery; J H Smith; A P Micolich; C Boydston; B C Scannell; M S Fairbanks; B Spehar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.