WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Nelfinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor, substrate of the transporter P-glycoprotein and metabolized via CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 enzymes. * Pharmacokinetic studies have shown wide interindividual variability of nelfinavir concentrations, some of this variability perhaps caused by variant drug metabolism or transporter genes. * For CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 polymorphism, results from three studies are in agreement, showing no difference in nelfinavir concentrations between patients with these different genotypes. * However, for MDR1 and CYP2C19 polymorphism, there have been contradictory studies, showing either no impact on nelfinavir concentration or modified concentrations which could influence virological response. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * Patients with an *1/*2 or *2/*2 genotype for CYP2C19 had a nelfinavir to M8 biotransformation divided by 2 compared with *1/*1 patients. * No evidence of any influence of MDR1 polymorphism on nelfinavir absorption could be detected. AIMS: To evaluate the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on nelfinavir and M8 pharmacokinetic variability in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients and to study the link between pharmacokinetic exposure and short-term efficacy and toxicity. METHODS: Nelfinavir (n = 120) and M8 (n = 119) concentrations were measured in 34 protease inhibitor-naive patients. Two weeks after initiating the treatment, blood samples were taken before, 1, 3 and 6 h after drug administration. Genotyping for CYP3A4, 3A5, 2C19 and MDR1 was performed. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe nelfinavir-M8 concentration time-courses and to estimate interpatient variability. The influence of individual characteristics and genotypes were tested using a likelihood ratio test. Estimated mean (C(mean)), maximal (C(max)) and trough (C(trough)) nelfinavir and M8 concentrations were correlated to short-term virological efficacy and tolerance using Spearman nonparametric correlation tests. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption, elimination and metabolism to M8 best described nelfinavir data. M8 was modelled by an additional compartment. Mean pharmacokinetic estimates and the corresponding intersubject variabilities were: absorption rate 0.17 h(-1) (99%), absorption lag time 0.82 h, apparent nelfinavir total clearance 52 l h(-1) (49%), apparent nelfinavir volume of distribution 191 l, M8 elimination rate constant 1.76 h(-1) and nelfinavir to M8 0.39 h(-1) (59%) in *1/*1 patients and 0.20 h(-1) in *1/*2 or *2/*2 patients for CYP2C19*2. Nelfinavir C(mean) was positively correlated to glycaemia and triglyceride increases (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of metabolism of nelfinavir to M8 was reduced by 50% in patients with *1/*2 or *2/*2 genotype for CYP2C19 compared with those with *1/*1 genotype.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Nelfinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor, substrate of the transporter P-glycoprotein and metabolized via CYP2C19, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 enzymes. * Pharmacokinetic studies have shown wide interindividual variability of nelfinavir concentrations, some of this variability perhaps caused by variant drug metabolism or transporter genes. * For CYP3A4*1B and CYP3A5*3 polymorphism, results from three studies are in agreement, showing no difference in nelfinavir concentrations between patients with these different genotypes. * However, for MDR1 and CYP2C19 polymorphism, there have been contradictory studies, showing either no impact on nelfinavir concentration or modified concentrations which could influence virological response. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * Patients with an *1/*2 or *2/*2 genotype for CYP2C19 had a nelfinavir to M8 biotransformation divided by 2 compared with *1/*1 patients. * No evidence of any influence of MDR1 polymorphism on nelfinavir absorption could be detected. AIMS: To evaluate the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on nelfinavir and M8 pharmacokinetic variability in human immunodeficiency virus-infectedpatients and to study the link between pharmacokinetic exposure and short-term efficacy and toxicity. METHODS:Nelfinavir (n = 120) and M8 (n = 119) concentrations were measured in 34 protease inhibitor-naive patients. Two weeks after initiating the treatment, blood samples were taken before, 1, 3 and 6 h after drug administration. Genotyping for CYP3A4, 3A5, 2C19 and MDR1 was performed. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe nelfinavir-M8 concentration time-courses and to estimate interpatient variability. The influence of individual characteristics and genotypes were tested using a likelihood ratio test. Estimated mean (C(mean)), maximal (C(max)) and trough (C(trough)) nelfinavir and M8 concentrations were correlated to short-term virological efficacy and tolerance using Spearman nonparametric correlation tests. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption, elimination and metabolism to M8 best described nelfinavir data. M8 was modelled by an additional compartment. Mean pharmacokinetic estimates and the corresponding intersubject variabilities were: absorption rate 0.17 h(-1) (99%), absorption lag time 0.82 h, apparent nelfinavir total clearance 52 l h(-1) (49%), apparent nelfinavir volume of distribution 191 l, M8 elimination rate constant 1.76 h(-1) and nelfinavir to M8 0.39 h(-1) (59%) in *1/*1 patients and 0.20 h(-1) in *1/*2 or *2/*2 patients for CYP2C19*2. Nelfinavir C(mean) was positively correlated to glycaemia and triglyceride increases (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of metabolism of nelfinavir to M8 was reduced by 50% in patients with *1/*2 or *2/*2 genotype for CYP2C19 compared with those with *1/*1 genotype.
Authors: Jacques Fellay; Catia Marzolini; Emma R Meaden; David J Back; Thierry Buclin; Jean Philippe Chave; Laurent A Decosterd; Hansjakob Furrer; Milos Opravil; Giuseppe Pantaleo; Dorota Retelska; Lidia Ruiz; Alfred H Schinkel; Pietro Vernazza; Chin B Eap; Amalio Telenti Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-01-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: I Cascorbi; T Gerloff; A Johne; C Meisel; S Hoffmeyer; M Schwab; E Schaeffeler; M Eichelbaum; U Brinkmann; I Roots Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: E Hustert; M Haberl; O Burk; R Wolbold; Y Q He; K Klein; A C Nuessler; P Neuhaus; J Klattig; R Eiselt; I Koch; A Zibat; J Brockmöller; J R Halpert; U M Zanger; L Wojnowski Journal: Pharmacogenetics Date: 2001-12
Authors: K E Zhang; E Wu; A K Patick; B Kerr; M Zorbas; A Lankford; T Kobayashi; Y Maeda; B Shetty; S Webber Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M H Reijers; H M Weigel; A A Hart; R W Ten Kate; J W Mulder; P Reiss; H Schuitemaker; R M Hoetelmans; G J Weverling; J M Lange Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-01-07 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: S M Hammer; K E Squires; M D Hughes; J M Grimes; L M Demeter; J S Currier; J J Eron; J E Feinberg; H H Balfour; L R Deyton; J A Chodakewitz; M A Fischl Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-09-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jenna A Rhoades; Yuri K Peterson; Hao-Jie Zhu; David I Appel; Charles A Peloquin; John S Markowitz Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: C Bazzoli; H Bénech; E Rey; S Retout; D Salmon; X Duval; J M Tréluyer; F Mentré Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Emily J Cox; Neha Maharao; Gabriela Patilea-Vrana; Jashvant D Unadkat; Allan E Rettie; Jeannine S McCune; Mary F Paine Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Akihiko Saitoh; Edmund Capparelli; Francesca Aweeka; Elizabeth Sarles; Kumud K Singh; Andrea Kovacs; Sandra K Burchett; Andrew Wiznia; Sharon Nachman; Terence Fenton; Stephen A Spector Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.731