Literature DB >> 17922347

Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead regions.

Susan Cairns1, Rachel Frith, Kevin J Munro, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term test-retest repeatability of the TEN(HL) test. Participants comprised 15 teenagers (mean age 14 years) with long-standing severe-to-profound hearing impairment, and 20 adults (mean age 74 years) with moderate-to-severe hearing impairment. Testing was repeated using the same equipment and procedures, after an interval of less than five days. The number of ears that met the criteria for diagnosing a cochlear dead region on initial test was three (13%) and nine (22.5%) for the teenagers and adults, respectively. Overall, the number of ears that changed category on retest was two (8%) and three (7.5%) for the teenagers and adults, respectively. Except at 1.5 and 4 kHz, the number of ears that changed category at individual frequencies was less than 5% for both groups of participants. TEN(HL) test repeatability was good when the results were categorized by ear or by frequency. The majority of ears that changed category on retest just met the dead-region criteria at an isolated frequency. An immediate retest is advisable in such cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922347     DOI: 10.1080/14992020701264128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  4 in total

1.  [Effect of frequency compression in hearing aids on speech intelligibility and subjective sound quality].

Authors:  M Leifholz; S Margolf-Hackl; S Kreikemeier; J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Earl E Johnson; Erin Picou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Jani Johnson; Izel Rivera
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN (SPL) test in adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; J Andrew Dundas
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.