Literature DB >> 17921906

Comparison of animal models for head and neck cancer cachexia.

Trinitia Cannon1, Marion Couch, Xiaoying Yin, Denis Guttridge, Victor Lai, Carol Shores.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Despite its negative impact on cancer patients, there are few animal models of cancer cachexia. Our hypothesis was that different human cell lines would variably induce cachexia. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective animal study.
METHODS: We established two xenograft models in athymic mice and compared these with a cachexigenic cell line, the murine adenocarcinoma 16 (MAC16) cell line. Eight-week-old female, athymic mice were injected with human head and neck cell lines (JHU022, JHU012) and the MAC16 cell line. Body weight, food intake, body composition, leg weights, serum cytokines, and lipid mobilizing factor (LMF) were compared.
RESULTS: Mean food intake for all groups was equivalent. Mean percent change in body weight after 18 days was 18%, 19%, 12%, and 3% for control, JHU012, JHU022, and MAC16 experimental groups, respectively. Both JHU022- and MAC16-injected mice showed wasting even when tumor burden was low. In contrast, mice injected with JHU012 developed larger tumors yet lacked evidence of cachexia. These mice demonstrated loss of lean body mass but not fat mass. Serum cytokine levels for interleukin (IL)-1 alpha and IL-1 beta were elevated in JHU022-bearing mice, whereas IL-1 alpha, IL-6, interferon (IFN)-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF)-alpha were elevated in MAC16-bearing mice. LMF was present in both the JHU022 and JHU012 cell lines.
CONCLUSIONS: The JHU022 cell line caused more severe cachexia than the JHU012 cells, suggesting these cell lines may be used to further study cancer cachexia. IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta in the JHU022 model may be mediators of cachexia, whereas TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and IL-6 may be mediators in MAC16-induced cachexia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17921906     DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181453658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  8 in total

1.  Metabolic signatures imaged in cancer-induced cachexia.

Authors:  Marie-France Penet; Mayur M Gadiya; Balaji Krishnamachary; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Martin G Pomper; Dmitri Artemov; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Intervention of mirtazapine on gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia in nude mice with pancreatic carcinoma xenografts.

Authors:  Shu-Man Jiang; Jian-Hua Wu; Lin Jia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Animal models of the cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome.

Authors:  Nabila Bennani-Baiti; Declan Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Molecular disruption of RAD50 sensitizes human tumor cells to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Waleed M Abuzeid; Xiaoling Jiang; Guoli Shi; Hui Wang; David Paulson; Koji Araki; David Jungreis; James Carney; Bert W O'Malley; Daqing Li
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Muscle wasting in animal models of severe illness.

Authors:  Milan Holecek
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Co-infection: the outcome of Plasmodium infection differs according to the time of pre-existing helminth infection.

Authors:  Víctor H Salazar-Castañón; Imelda Juárez-Avelar; Martha Legorreta-Herrera; Tzipe Govezensky; Miriam Rodriguez-Sosa
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  InACTIVatINg cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Sam J Mathew
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.758

8.  Macrophage migration inhibitory factor contributes to immunopathogenesis during Plasmodium yoelii 17XL infection.

Authors:  Víctor H Salazar-Castañón; Imelda Juárez-Avelar; Martha Legorreta-Herrera; Miriam Rodriguez-Sosa
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.073

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.