Literature DB >> 17921744

Risk stratification of individual coronary lesions using local endothelial shear stress: a new paradigm for managing coronary artery disease.

Yiannis S Chatzizisis1, Ahmet U Coskun, Michael Jonas, Elazer R Edelman, Peter H Stone, Charles L Feldman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize the role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis, and to propose an individualized risk-stratification strategy of atherosclerotic lesions based on the in-vivo characterization of local endothelial shear stress and wall morphology. RECENT
FINDINGS: Low endothelial shear stress promotes the development of early fibroatheromas, which subsequently follow an individualized natural history of progression. This individual natural history is critically dependent on the magnitude of low endothelial shear stress, which subsequently regulates the severity of inflammation within the wall and ultimately the vascular remodeling response. Very low endothelial shear stress enhances plaque inflammation, leading to excessive expansive remodeling. Excessive expansive remodeling leads to perpetuation, or even exacerbation, of the local low endothelial shear stress environment, thereby setting up a self-perpetuating vicious cycle among low local endothelial shear stress, inflammation, and excessive expansive remodeling, which transforms an early fibroatheroma to a high-risk plaque.
SUMMARY: In-vivo assessment of the local endothelial shear stress environment, severity of inflammation and vascular remodeling response, all responsible for individual plaque behavior and natural history, in combination with systemic biomarkers of vulnerability, may allow for detailed risk stratification of individual early atherosclerotic plaques, thereby guiding both systemic and local, lesion-specific therapeutic strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17921744     DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3282f07548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol        ISSN: 0268-4705            Impact factor:   2.161


  10 in total

1.  Biomechanical Regulation of Endothelium-dependent Events Critical for Adaptive Remodeling.

Authors:  Peter J Mack; Yuzhi Zhang; Seok Chung; Vernella Vickerman; Roger D Kamm; Guillermo García-Cardeña
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Shear stress and plaque development.

Authors:  Saurabh S Dhawan; Ravi P Avati Nanjundappa; Jonathan R Branch; W Robert Taylor; Arshed A Quyyumi; Hanjoong Jo; Michael C McDaniel; Jin Suo; Don Giddens; Habib Samady
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2010-04

3.  Difference in inflammation, atherosclerosis, and platelet activation between coronary artery aneurysm and coronary artery ectasia.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Xingxu Wang; Zhenghao Huang; Xiaolin Li; Yu Luo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Coronary computed tomography angiography based assessment of endothelial shear stress and its association with atherosclerotic plaque distribution in-vivo.

Authors:  Holger Hetterich; Ahmad Jaber; Moritz Gehring; Adrian Curta; Fabian Bamberg; Nenad Filipovic; Johannes Rieber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Development of a synthetic gene network to modulate gene expression by mechanical forces.

Authors:  Zoltán Kis; Tania Rodin; Asma Zafar; Zhangxing Lai; Grace Freke; Oliver Fleck; Armando Del Rio Hernandez; Leila Towhidi; Ryan M Pedrigi; Takayuki Homma; Rob Krams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Multiscale Modeling of Vascular Remodeling Induced by Wall Shear Stress.

Authors:  Shiliang Chen; Hanbing Zhang; Qianwen Hou; Yu Zhang; Aike Qiao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Association of global and local low endothelial shear stress with high-risk plaque using intracoronary 3D optical coherence tomography: Introduction of 'shear stress score'.

Authors:  Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Konstantinos Toutouzas; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Maria Riga; Antonios P Antoniadis; Yusuke Fujinom; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Vassilis G Koutkias; Grigorios Cheimariotis; Charalampos Doulaverakis; Ioannis Tsampoulatidis; Ioanna Chouvarda; Ioannis Kompatsiaris; Sunao Nakamura; Frank J Rybicki; Nicos Maglaveras; Dimitris Tousoulis; George D Giannoglou
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Computational fluid dynamics modeling of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis may predict risk of stroke recurrence.

Authors:  Xinyi Leng; Fabien Scalzo; Hing Lung Ip; Mark Johnson; Albert K Fong; Florence S Y Fan; Xiangyan Chen; Yannie O Y Soo; Zhongrong Miao; Liping Liu; Edward Feldmann; Thomas W H Leung; David S Liebeskind; Ka Sing Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Macrophage accumulation within coronary arterial wall in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome: a study with in-vivo intravascular imaging modalities.

Authors:  Takaaki Kogo; Takafumi Hiro; Daisuke Kitano; Tadateru Takayama; Daisuke Fukamachi; Tomoyuki Morikawa; Mitsumasa Sudo; Yasuo Okumura
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  High Coronary Wall Shear Stress Worsens Plaque Vulnerability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Artan Bajraktari; Ibadete Bytyçi; Michael Y Henein
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.619

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.