OBJECTIVE: The attempt to improve therapeutic results in pancreatic carcinoma has recently focused on the emerging role of molecular biology. We investigated the role of COX-2 and NF-KB expression in relation to the use of a COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) associated to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Forty-four patients with histologically or cytologically verified, locally advanced unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma were eligible for the study. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (75%) assumed celecoxib for all their treatment period. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks, until there was evidence of disease progression, patient refusal, or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was assessed according to tumor response, clinical benefit, and time-related parameters. Five patients had a partial response, 24 had a stable disease, and 15 had a disease progression, for an overall response rate of 11%. Biochemical response rate based on CA 19.9 levels showed 2 complete and 10 partial responses, whereas 31 patients presented no changes of CA 19.9 levels. COX-2 protein expression was found in 30 tumors, while a moderate or weak/absent expression was present in 10 patients. Sixteen tumors showed a strong expression for NF-KB, 4 a moderate expression, and 5 a weak/absent expression. CONCLUSION: The use of a COX-2 inhibitor does not add any valuable activity to a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination, even in patients with COX-2 and NF-KB overexpressing tumors.
OBJECTIVE: The attempt to improve therapeutic results in pancreatic carcinoma has recently focused on the emerging role of molecular biology. We investigated the role of COX-2 and NF-KB expression in relation to the use of a COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) associated to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Forty-four patients with histologically or cytologically verified, locally advanced unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma were eligible for the study. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (75%) assumed celecoxib for all their treatment period. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks, until there was evidence of disease progression, patient refusal, or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was assessed according to tumor response, clinical benefit, and time-related parameters. Five patients had a partial response, 24 had a stable disease, and 15 had a disease progression, for an overall response rate of 11%. Biochemical response rate based on CA 19.9 levels showed 2 complete and 10 partial responses, whereas 31 patients presented no changes of CA 19.9 levels. COX-2 protein expression was found in 30 tumors, while a moderate or weak/absent expression was present in 10 patients. Sixteen tumors showed a strong expression for NF-KB, 4 a moderate expression, and 5 a weak/absent expression. CONCLUSION: The use of a COX-2 inhibitor does not add any valuable activity to a gemcitabine/oxaliplatin combination, even in patients with COX-2 and NF-KB overexpressing tumors.
Authors: Joelle Hillion; Shamayra S Smail; Francescopaolo Di Cello; Amy Belton; Sandeep N Shah; Tait Huso; Andrew Schuldenfrei; Dwella Moton Nelson; Leslie Cope; Nathaniel Campbell; Collins Karikari; Abimbola Aderinto; Anirban Maitra; David L Huso; Linda M S Resar Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Dharmalingam Subramaniam; Nathan D Nicholes; Animesh Dhar; Shahid Umar; Vibhudutta Awasthi; Danny R Welch; Roy A Jensen; Shrikant Anant Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jennifer Kl Colby; Russell D Klein; Mark J McArthur; Claudio J Conti; Kaoru Kiguchi; Toru Kawamoto; Penny K Riggs; Amy I Pavone; Janet Sawicki; Susan M Fischer Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Prakash Radhakrishnan; Vashti C Bryant; Elizabeth C Blowers; Rajkumar N Rajule; Nagsen Gautam; Muhammad M Anwar; Ashley M Mohr; Paul M Grandgenett; Stephanie K Bunt; Jamie L Arnst; Subodh M Lele; Yazen Alnouti; Michael A Hollingsworth; Amarnath Natarajan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joel D Maust; Christy L Frankowski-McGregor; Armand Bankhead; Diane M Simeone; Judith S Sebolt-Leopold Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 6.261