Literature DB >> 17921712

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer: phase II results of preliminary pharmacologic and molecular efforts to mitigate toxicity and predict outcomes: North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N0044).

Aminah Jatoi1, James A Martenson, Nathan R Foster, Howard L McLeod, Bradley S Lair, Frank Nichols, Loren K Tschetter, Dennis F Moore, Tom R Fitch, Steven R Alberts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Locally advanced esophageal cancer is challenging to treat. This study tested a 3-drug, multimodality approach. Chemotherapy dose reductions, the addition of amifostine, and pharmacogenetics were tested in an effort to mitigate toxicity and predict outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II trial tested chemotherapy (carboplatin area under the curve = 4 [lower dose than that from Meluch et al] on day 1 and 22, 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m2 per day continuous infusion on days 1 to 42, and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22) with concomitant radiation 4500 cG for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy was scheduled after radiation. Amifostine 500 mg subcutaneously before radiation was given to the first 19 patients.
RESULTS: Among 54 eligible patients, the pathologic complete response rate was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23%-49%). Median survival was 21.2 months (95% CI, 13.6-37.6 months), and median time to cancer recurrence/progression 19 months (95% CI, 11.4-44.6 months). Nearly all patients (94%) suffered at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event, including 3 treatment-related deaths. Amifostine was discontinued because of one of these deaths. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of severe adverse events among patients who received amifostine and those who did not. Genotyping for polymorphisms of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, cytochrome P3A4, and glutathione-S-transferase did not predict tumor response or severe adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: This 3-drug, multimodality approach yielded a pathologic complete response rate of 35%, but the severe adverse event rate was high. Utilizing amifostine to reduce toxicity or employing molecular approaches to predict outcomes did not show promise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17921712     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31805c139a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  4 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of esophageal stents preceding or during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinayak Nagaraja; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-04

2.  Complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer is associated with enhanced survival.

Authors:  James M Donahue; Francis C Nichols; Zhuo Li; David A Schomas; Mark S Allen; Stephen D Cassivi; Aminah Jatoi; Robert C Miller; Dennis A Wigle; K Robert Shen; Claude Deschamps
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Translational medicine and reliability of single-nucleotide polymorphism studies: can we believe in SNP reports or not?

Authors:  Antonis Valachis; Davide Mauri; Christodoulos Neophytou; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Lampriani Tsali; Antonios Garras; Evangelos G Papanikolau
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  A randomized phase 3 trial comparing paclitaxel plus 5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil in Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma-the ESO-shanghai 1 trial protocol.

Authors:  Yun Chen; Zhengfei Zhu; Weixin Zhao; Ling Li; Jinjun Ye; Chaoyang Wu; Huarong Tang; Qin Lin; Jiancheng Li; Yi Xia; Yunhai Li; Jialiang Zhou; Kuaile Zhao
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.