Marie Lewné1, Nils Plato, Per Gustavsson. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. marie.lewne@sll.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to investigate the personal exposure to diesel and petrol exhaust fumes in occupations when exposure is prevalent and/or high. We also investigated the correlation between the five particle fractions [particles with an aerodynamic diameter <1 microm (PM(1)), particles with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 microm (PM(2.5)), particles in size 0.1-10 microm, elemental carbon (EC) and total carbon (TC)] and nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), in the various occupational environments. METHODS: Seventy-one workers were included in the study. They were subdivided into seven groups depending on working area, working indoors, out of doors or in vehicles and type of exposure (diesel or petrol exhaust). Personal measurements were performed during 3 days per worker. We used five indicators of the particle fraction: PM(1), PM(2.5), particle measured with a real-time monitoring instrument for particles in sizes 0.1 and 10 microm (DataRAM), EC and TC. We used NO(2) as an indicator of the gas phase. RESULTS: Tunnel construction workers showed the highest levels of exposure for all indicators, followed by diesel-exposed garage workers. For the other five groups, the levels were statistically significantly lower, and the differences between the groups were small. The full-shift geometric average of PM(1) varied between 119 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 11 microg m(-3) (taxi drivers). For PM(2.5), the levels varied between 231 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 16 microg m(-3) (bus and lorry drivers). For the measurements with the real-time monitoring instrument DataRAM, the levels varied between 398 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 14 microg m(-3) (taxi drivers). For EC, the levels varied between 87 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 4 microg m(-3) (other outdoor workers exposed to diesel exhaust), and for TC, the levels varied between 191 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 10 microg m(-3) (taxi drivers). Finally, for NO(2), the levels varied between 350 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 32 microg m(-3) (other outdoor workers exposed to diesel exhaust). For the indoor workers exposed to diesel exhaust fumes only, all the indicators correlated comparatively well and statistically significantly to each other (r(2) = 0.44-0.89). For the other groups, correlations were lower and showed no consistent pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The tunnel construction workers had exposure levels for all indicator substances that were considerably and significantly higher than for the other groups. The NO(2) levels were higher for indoor workers exposed to diesel exhaust than for all other groups (except tunnel construction workers). All particle fractions, as well as NO(2) correlated well in occupations with indoor exposure to diesel exhaust.
OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to investigate the personal exposure to diesel and petrol exhaust fumes in occupations when exposure is prevalent and/or high. We also investigated the correlation between the five particle fractions [particles with an aerodynamic diameter <1 microm (PM(1)), particles with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 microm (PM(2.5)), particles in size 0.1-10 microm, elemental carbon (EC) and total carbon (TC)] and nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), in the various occupational environments. METHODS: Seventy-one workers were included in the study. They were subdivided into seven groups depending on working area, working indoors, out of doors or in vehicles and type of exposure (diesel or petrol exhaust). Personal measurements were performed during 3 days per worker. We used five indicators of the particle fraction: PM(1), PM(2.5), particle measured with a real-time monitoring instrument for particles in sizes 0.1 and 10 microm (DataRAM), EC and TC. We used NO(2) as an indicator of the gas phase. RESULTS: Tunnel construction workers showed the highest levels of exposure for all indicators, followed by diesel-exposed garage workers. For the other five groups, the levels were statistically significantly lower, and the differences between the groups were small. The full-shift geometric average of PM(1) varied between 119 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 11 microg m(-3) (taxi drivers). For PM(2.5), the levels varied between 231 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 16 microg m(-3) (bus and lorry drivers). For the measurements with the real-time monitoring instrument DataRAM, the levels varied between 398 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 14 microg m(-3) (taxi drivers). For EC, the levels varied between 87 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 4 microg m(-3) (other outdoor workers exposed to diesel exhaust), and for TC, the levels varied between 191 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 10 microg m(-3) (taxi drivers). Finally, for NO(2), the levels varied between 350 microg m(-3) (tunnel construction workers) and 32 microg m(-3) (other outdoor workers exposed to diesel exhaust). For the indoor workers exposed to diesel exhaust fumes only, all the indicators correlated comparatively well and statistically significantly to each other (r(2) = 0.44-0.89). For the other groups, correlations were lower and showed no consistent pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The tunnel construction workers had exposure levels for all indicator substances that were considerably and significantly higher than for the other groups. The NO(2) levels were higher for indoor workers exposed to diesel exhaust than for all other groups (except tunnel construction workers). All particle fractions, as well as NO(2) correlated well in occupations with indoor exposure to diesel exhaust.
Authors: Patricia A Stewart; Joseph B Coble; Roel Vermeulen; Patricia Schleiff; Aaron Blair; Jay Lubin; Michael Attfield; Debra T Silverman Journal: Ann Occup Hyg Date: 2010-09-27
Authors: Funmi Apantaku-Onayemi; William Baldyga; Shaffdeen Amuwo; Adedeji Adefuye; Terry Mason; Robin Mitchell; Daniel S Blumenthal Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2012-05
Authors: Ann C Olsson; Per Gustavsson; Hans Kromhout; Susan Peters; Roel Vermeulen; Irene Brüske; Beate Pesch; Jack Siemiatycki; Javier Pintos; Thomas Brüning; Adrian Cassidy; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Dario Consonni; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil Caporaso; Nils Plato; Franco Merletti; Dario Mirabelli; Lorenzo Richiardi; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Wolfgang Ahrens; Hermann Pohlabeln; Jolanta Lissowska; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; David Zaridze; Isabelle Stücker; Simone Benhamou; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Peter Rudnai; Eleonora Fabianova; Rodica Stanescu Dumitru; Isabelle M Gross; Benjamin Kendzia; Francesco Forastiere; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Paul Brennan; Paolo Boffetta; Kurt Straif Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Roel Vermeulen; Joseph B Coble; Daniel Yereb; Jay H Lubin; Aaron Blair; Lützen Portengen; Patricia A Stewart; Michael Attfield; Debra T Silverman Journal: Ann Occup Hyg Date: 2010-09-27
Authors: Anna Ilar; Marie Lewné; Nils Plato; Johan Hallqvist; Magnus Alderling; Carolina Bigert; Christer Hogstedt; Per Gustavsson Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Jamie M Goodson; Chad S Weldy; James W MacDonald; Yonggang Liu; Theo K Bammler; Wei-Ming Chien; Michael T Chin Journal: FASEB J Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Nicole S Ngo; Michael Gatari; Beizhan Yan; Steven N Chillrud; Kheira Bouhamam; Patrick L Kinneym Journal: Atmos Environ (1994) Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kelechi Isiugo; Nicholas Newman; Roman Jandarov; Sergey A Grinshpun; Tiina Reponen Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.155