Literature DB >> 17920849

The guessability of traffic signs: effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features.

Annie W Y Ng1, Alan H S Chan.   

Abstract

This experiment investigated the relationships between the characteristics of prospective-users of traffic signs (people who will use the signs in the future) and the guessability of traffic signs, and also examined the effects of sign design features on the guessability of traffic signs. Forty-one Hong Kong Chinese subjects guessed the meanings and rated the sign features of 120 Mainland Chinese signs. Contrary to expectation, cycling experience and previous experience with sign information had no effect on sign guessing. Males and females with similar education level had similar guessing performance. Previous experience of visiting Mainland China was a significant predictor of guessing performance. Family ownership of a vehicle was associated with guessing performance for subjects who intended to become a driver and for those with car game experience. Subjects who claimed to pay attention to traffic signs in daily life performed better at sign guessing than those who did not. Traffic incident experience did not seem to enhance awareness of, or knowledge about, traffic signs. Guessability of a sign varied with the five design features of; familiarity, concreteness, simplicity, meaningfulness, and semantic closeness of the sign. Semantic closeness was the best predictor of guessability score, followed by familiarity, meaningfulness, concreteness, and simplicity. In order to design more user-friendly traffic signs and effective ways of using them, it is suggested that designers develop and evaluate signs according to the relative importance of the five sign features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920849     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  6 in total

1.  "Bicycles May Use Full Lane" Signage Communicates U.S. Roadway Rules and Increases Perception of Safety.

Authors:  George Hess; M Nils Peterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Investigation of the Contributory Factors to the Guessability of Traffic Signs.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Huiying Wen; Dianchen Zhu; Wesley Kumfer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Guessability of U.S. pharmaceutical pictograms in Iranian prospective users.

Authors:  Mahnaz Saremi; Zeinab S Shekaripour; Soheila Khodakarim
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2020-03-14

4.  Study on the Relationship between Drivers' Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility.

Authors:  Antoni Wontorczyk; Stanislaw Gaca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  How Do Older Adults Process Icons in Visual Search Tasks? The Combined Effects of Icon Type and Cognitive Aging.

Authors:  Jianfeng Wu; Dongfang Jiao; Chunfu Lu; Chengmin Li; Xiaofang Huang; Suzan Weng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  The use of contextual cues to improve warning symbol comprehension: making the connection for older adults.

Authors:  Mary F Lesch; W Ryan Powell; William J Horrey; Michael S Wogalter
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.778

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.