Literature DB >> 17920730

Reduction of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus load in nasal excretions, saliva and exhaled air of vaccinated pigs following direct contact challenge.

S Parida1, L Fleming, Y Oh, M Mahapatra, P Hamblin, J Gloster, C Doel, S Gubbins, D J Paton.   

Abstract

In future, a policy of "vaccinate-to-live" may be included in the repertoire of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) control measures and in support of this approach, we have investigated the hypothesis that vaccine-induced reduction in virus replication and excretion from pigs can be correlated to the severity of clinical signs of FMD by measuring excretion of virus in natural secretions and aerosols. The other aims of this study were to verify the existence of sub-clinical infection in vaccinated pigs, to evaluate the correlation between this and seroconversion to foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) non-structural protein antibodies and to re-examine the occurrence of FMDV persistence in the oro-pharynx of pigs. Therefore, pigs were vaccinated (O1 Manisa) and challenged (O1 UKG) in a manner calculated to produce a broad range of clinical outcomes and were monitored for a minimum of another 33 days post-challenge. Eighty-one percent of the early (10 days vaccinated) challenged pigs and 25% of the late (29 days vaccinated) challenged pigs were clinically infected and all other vaccinated pigs were sub-clinically infected. Although vaccination could not provide complete clinical or virological protection, it reduced the severity of the disease, virus excretion and production of non-structural FMDV antibodies in vaccinated and subsequently infected pigs. As hypothesised, vaccine-induced reduction of virus replication and excretion was found to be correlated to the severity of clinical disease. RNA copies, but no live virus was detected from the pharyngeal and soft palate tissues of a minority of vaccinated and infected pigs beyond the acute stage of the infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920730     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.08.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  10 in total

1.  Protection against direct in-contact challenge following foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in sheep and goats: the effect on virus excretion and carrier status.

Authors:  Muthukrishnan Madhanmohan; Singanallur Balasubramanian Nagendrakumar; Villuppanoor Alwar Srinivasan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Seroprevalence of foot-and-mouth disease in the southern provinces of Cambodia.

Authors:  Sothyra Tum; Ian Ducan Robertson; John Edwards; Ronello Abila; Subhash Morzaria
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Virus Excretion from Foot-And-Mouth Disease Virus Carrier Cattle and Their Potential Role in Causing New Outbreaks.

Authors:  Aravindh Babu R Parthiban; Mana Mahapatra; Simon Gubbins; Satya Parida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The Pathogenesis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Pigs.

Authors:  Carolina Stenfeldt; Fayna Diaz-San Segundo; Teresa de Los Santos; Luis L Rodriguez; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-23

5.  Transmission of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus during the Incubation Period in Pigs.

Authors:  Carolina Stenfeldt; Juan M Pacheco; Barbara P Brito; Karla I Moreno-Torres; Matt A Branan; Amy H Delgado; Luis L Rodriguez; Jonathan Arzt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-21

6.  Efficacy of an adenovirus-vectored foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A subunit vaccine in cattle using a direct contact transmission model.

Authors:  John G Neilan; Christopher Schutta; José Barrera; Melia Pisano; Laszlo Zsak; Ethan Hartwig; Max V Rasmussen; Barbara J Kamicker; Damodar Ettyreddy; Douglas E Brough; Bryan T Butman; David A Brake
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Mathematical Quantification of Transmission in Experiments: FMDV Transmission in Pigs Can Be Blocked by Vaccination and Separation.

Authors:  Aldo Dekker; Herman J W van Roermund; Thomas J Hagenaars; Phaedra L Eblé; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-20

Review 8.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  Further evaluation of an ELISA kit for detection of antibodies to a nonstructural protein of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Fukai; Tatsuya Nishi; Kazuki Morioka; Manabu Yamada; Kazuo Yoshida; Rie Kitano; Reiko Yamazoe; Toru Kanno
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 10.  Challenges of Generating and Maintaining Protective Vaccine-Induced Immune Responses for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Pigs.

Authors:  Nicholas A Lyons; Young S Lyoo; Donald P King; David J Paton
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.