Literature DB >> 17920368

Usefulness of tissue Doppler velocity and strain dyssynchrony for predicting left ventricular reverse remodeling response after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Cheuk-Man Yu1, John Gorcsan, Gabe B Bleeker, Qing Zhang, Martin J Schalij, Matthew S Suffoletto, Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung, David Schwartzman, Yat-Sun Chan, Masaki Tanabe, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

The assessment of systolic dyssynchrony by echocardiography is useful in predicting a favorable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Tissue Doppler velocity and tissue Doppler longitudinal strain have been suggested for this purpose. This study compared parameters of systolic dyssynchrony derived from these 2 imaging modalities for their predictive values of CRT response. Two hundred fifty-six patients from 3 different centers who received CRT were followed for 6 +/- 3 months. Parameters of systolic dyssynchrony based on tissue Doppler velocity and strain imaging were assessed for the prediction of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (reduction of LV end-systolic volume > or =15%). These included time to peak systolic velocity (or peak strain) of 12 LV segments to calculate the SD (Ts-SD or Tepsilon-SD), maximal difference in delay (Ts-Diff or Tepsilon-Diff), and opposite wall delay (Ts-OW or Tepsilon-OW). The septal-to-lateral delay (Ts-Sep-Lat or Tepsilon-Sep-Lat) was also measured. LV reverse remodeling, defined as improvement in end-systolic volume > or =15%, was observed in 141 patients (55%). All 4 tissue velocity parameters predicted LV reverse remodeling, and the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were 0.86, 0.85, 0.84, and 0.79 for Ts-SD, Ts-Diff, Ts-OW, and Ts-Sep-Lat, respectively (all p <0.001). The cut-off values derived from receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis were 33 ms for Ts-SD, 100 ms for Ts-Diff, 90 ms for Ts-OW, and 60 ms for Ts-Sep-Lat, and their sensitivities were 93%, 92%, 81%, and 70%, with specificities of 78%, 68%, 80%, and 76%, respectively. In contrast, none of the longitudinal strain parameters predicted LV reverse remodeling. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves ranged from 0.49 to 0.53 (all p = NS). The same conclusions were obtained in subgroup analyses of QRS duration (120 to 150 vs >150 ms) and ischemic or nonischemic cause of heart failure. In conclusion, parameters of tissue Doppler longitudinal velocity, but not longitudinal strain, predicted LV reverse remodeling after CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920368     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  42 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiography, dyssynchrony, and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; John E Sanderson; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Echocardiographic tools for pacemaker optimization of ventricular function in an infant following surgical repair for double outlet right ventricle.

Authors:  Aamir Jeewa; Mary T Potts; Shubhayan Sanatani; Walter J Duncan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients without left intraventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Dominique Auger; Gabe B Bleeker; Matteo Bertini; See H Ewe; Rutger J van Bommel; Tomasz G Witkowski; Arnold C T Ng; Lieselot van Erven; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Strain and strain rate deformation parameters: from tissue Doppler to 2D speckle tracking.

Authors:  Harry Pavlopoulos; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Strain imaging in echocardiography: methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Gillian C Nesbitt; Sunil Mankad; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Imaging in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  C Ypenburg; E E van der Wall; M J Schalij; J J Bax
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 7.  Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

9.  Visual LV motion and invasive LVdP/dtmax for selection and optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  A H M Jansen; B M van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Early detection of cardiac dysfunction in the type 1 diabetic heart using speckle-tracking based strain imaging.

Authors:  Danielle L Shepherd; Cody E Nichols; Tara L Croston; Sarah L McLaughlin; Ashley B Petrone; Sara E Lewis; Dharendra Thapa; Dustin M Long; Gregory M Dick; John M Hollander
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 5.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.