Literature DB >> 17920098

Selectivity for coherence in polar orientation in human form vision.

J Edwin Dickinson1, David R Badcock.   

Abstract

Evidence from summation near threshold psychophysical experiments using compound Glass patterns is presented which supports the existence of mechanisms in the human visual system tuned for coherence in radial and concentric, and +45 degrees and -45 degrees spiral orientations. It is suggested that sensitivity to +45 degrees and -45 degrees logarithmic spirals serves to disambiguate the sense of spiral form, which would not be uniquely specified by measures of the components of orientation along the radial and concentric directions alone. A spiral space is introduced within which radial and concentric patterns are diametrically opposed on one axis and spirals of +45 degrees and -45 degrees on an orthogonal axis and it is proposed that these represent cardinal axes for detecting global structure. Comparison of the sensitivity tuning functions of the four mechanisms tuned to these axes with sensitivity to simple spiral Glass patterns shows that weighted combinations of output from adjacent pairs of this set of mechanisms are sufficient to account for absolute sensitivity to logarithmic spiral Glass patterns of all intermediate spiral angles. Control experiments demonstrate that the combinations are labeled for spiral sense (simple spirals of -22.5 degrees spiral angle can be discriminated from +22.5 degrees spirals at threshold for detection) and that adaptation transfers across quadrants of spiral space (adaptation to spirals of -22.5 degrees results in a decrease in sensitivity to orthogonal +22.5 degrees and -67.5 degrees spirals). Together these observations suggest that sensitivity to spirals in each of the quadrants of spiral space is due to higher order mechanisms reliant on output from 0 degrees , 90 degrees , +45 degrees and -45 degrees cardinal mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920098     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  3 in total

1.  Paradoxical psychometric functions ("swan functions") are explained by dilution masking in four stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-01-02

2.  A common rule for integration and suppression of luminance contrast across eyes, space, time, and pattern.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Daniel H Baker
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-01-02

Review 3.  Using perceptual tasks to selectively measure magnocellular and parvocellular performance: Rationale and a user's guide.

Authors:  Mark Edwards; Stephanie C Goodhew; David R Badcock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.