Literature DB >> 17920005

Efficacy and safety of risedronate 150 mg once a month in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Pierre D Delmas1, Michael R McClung, José R Zanchetta, Artur Racewicz, Christian Roux, Claude-Laurent Benhamou, Zulema Man, Rachelle A Eusebio, John F Beary, David E Burgio, Ellen Matzkin, Steven Boonen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Risedronate has been shown to be effective in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis when given orally in daily or weekly doses or on 2 consecutive days per month. This randomized, double-blind, multi-center study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a single 150 mg risedronate once-a-month oral dose compared with the 5 mg daily regimen.
METHODS: Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive risedronate 5 mg daily (n=642) or 150 mg once a month (followed by daily placebo) (n=650) in a double-blind fashion for 2 years. Study drug was taken on an empty stomach at least 30 min before breakfast. Bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, fractures, and adverse events were evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density after 1 year.
RESULTS: 538 patients in the daily group (83.8%) and 556 patients in the once-a-month group (85.5%) completed 1 year. The mean percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density was 3.4% (95% confidence interval, 3.03% to 3.82%) in the daily group and 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.15% to 3.93%) in the once-a-month group. The difference between groups was -0.1% (95% confidence interval, -0.51% to 0.27%). The once-a-month regimen was determined to be non-inferior to the daily regimen based on prospectively defined criteria. The mean percent changes in bone mineral density at sites in the hip (total proximal femur, femoral neck, femoral trochanter) were also similar in both dose groups, as were the changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. The incidence of adverse events, adverse events leading to withdrawal, and upper gastrointestinal tract adverse events were similar in the 2 treatment groups. Both regimens were well tolerated; the percent of patients who withdrew from treatment as a result of an adverse event was 9.5% in the daily group and 8.6% in the once-a-month group.
CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate 150 mg once a month is similar in efficacy and safety to daily dosing and may provide an alternative for patients who prefer once-a-month oral dosing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17920005     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  34 in total

Review 1.  Use of CTX-I and PINP as bone turnover markers: National Bone Health Alliance recommendations to standardize sample handling and patient preparation to reduce pre-analytical variability.

Authors:  P Szulc; K Naylor; N R Hoyle; R Eastell; E T Leary
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Pharmacometrics and systems pharmacology for metabolic bone diseases.

Authors:  Matthew M Riggs; Serge Cremers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Updates on mechanism of action and clinical efficacy of risedronate in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ranuccio Nuti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

4.  Hospitalisations for fracture and associated costs between 2000 and 2009 in Ireland: a trend analysis.

Authors:  B McGowan; M C Casey; C Silke; B Whelan; K Bennett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis: insights for clinicians.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 6.  Preventing nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures with extended-interval bisphosphonates: regimen selection and clinical application.

Authors:  Raymond E Cole; Steven T Harris
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2009-01-13

7.  Recent advances in managing osteoporosis.

Authors:  Claudia Gagnon; Peter R Ebeling
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-12-15

8.  Higher doses of bisphosphonates further improve bone mass, architecture, and strength but not the tissue material properties in aged rats.

Authors:  Mohammad Shahnazari; Wei Yao; WeiWei Dai; Bob Wang; Sophi S Ionova-Martin; Robert O Ritchie; Daniel Heeren; Andrew J Burghardt; Daniel P Nicolella; Michael G Kimiecik; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  Optimizing dosing frequencies for bisphosphonates in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient considerations.

Authors:  John Sunyecz
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Gastrointestinal tolerability with ibandronate after previous weekly bisphosphonate treatment.

Authors:  Richard Derman; Joseph D Kohles; Ann Babbitt
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.