Literature DB >> 17919544

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of buprenorphine after a single intravenous administration in healthy volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

Monica Escher1, Youssef Daali, Jocelyne Chabert, Gérard Hopfgartner, Pierre Dayer, Jules Desmeules.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is used as an analgesic for postoperative and chronic pain. The usual sublingual dose is 0.2 to 0.8 mg, and the usual parenteral dose is 0.3 mg for acute postoperative pain. The pharmacokinetic and related pharmacodynamic properties of buprenorphine at these doses have not been characterized.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic properties of buprenorphine 0.002 mg/kg IV (0.15 mg/70 kg) and its antinociceptive and psychomotor effects.
METHODS: Healthy male volunteers received 0.002 mg/kg buprenorphine IV in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Blood samples were collected at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours for the determination of plasma concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a compartmental model using specialized software. Antinociceptive and psychomotor effects were determined for 8 hours. Quantitative sensory testing with thermal and electrical (nociceptive flexion RIII reflex) stimulations was performed. The cold pressor test was used to assess pain tolerance to a tonic, intense pain stimulation. Psychomotor performance was assessed by the digit symbol substitution test (DSST). Participants also rated sedation on an 11-point numeric scale (0 = none to 10 = severe). A selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay was developed for the determination of buprenorphine; the limit of quantification was 0.05 ng/mL using a 0.25-mL plasma aliquot. Participants were instructed to report adverse effects, which were recorded for type, time of onset, seriousness, and duration.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 12 participants, all of whom were white. Mean (SD) age was 26 (3.5) years, and mean weight was 67 (9) kg. None of the participants had a history of opiate abuse. Buprenorphine significantly increased the objective (nociceptive flexion RIII reflex) and subjective pain thresholds for >4 hours and pain tolerance (cold pressor test) for 2 hours. The mean (SD) RIII reflex threshold and subjective threshold at baseline were 31.6 (9.5) mA and 45.5 (22.3) mA, respectively. The maximum increases (mean [SD]) were +14.1 (17.5) mA for the RIII reflex (P = 0.02) and +24.2 (21.7) mA for the subjective threshold (P = 0.02), corresponding to mean (SEM) percentages of 53.7% (20.2%) and 74.7% (20.4%) of the baseline values, respectively. The maximum increases were observed at 120 minutes for both measures. The effect of buprenorphine on pain tolerance peaked at 30 minutes. Mean (SEM) latency before withdrawal of the hand was 69 (10) seconds, corresponding to a mean increase of 63.8% (14.4%) from baseline (P = 0.003). Buprenorphine had a significant effect on the DSST. The mean maximum decrease in the total number of symbols drawn was -6 (14.5%; P = 0.005) at 1 hour. The participants reported high levels of sedation: at peak effect (120 minutes), mean scores increased from 2.9 to 6.4 (SEM 0.7) (P = 0.005). Levels returned to baseline values by the end of the session, unlike for the nociceptive tests. The onset of effects occurred during the distribution phase for all the measures, and their duration was observed across a wide range of concentrations during the elimination phase. The most likely explanation for this finding is the high affinity of buprenorphine at mu-opioid receptors, and possibly distribution to the brain. Buprenorphine t(l/2) was 2.75 hours. A secondary peak in concentration was observed at 90 minutes, suggesting enterohepatic circulation of buprenorphine. A 2-compartment model adequately described buprenorphine pharmacokinetics.
CONCLUSIONS: A clinically relevant analgesic dose of 0.002 mg/kg (0.15 mg/70 kg) of buprenorphine had a significant effect on nociception and psychomotor performance in these healthy male volunteers. A 2-compartment model satisfactorily characterized buprenorphine pharmacokinetics, and we found evidence of enterohepatic circulation. Copyright 2007 Excerpta Medica, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919544     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  12 in total

Review 1.  Multiple peaking phenomena in pharmacokinetic disposition.

Authors:  Neal M Davies; Jody K Takemoto; Dion R Brocks; Jaime A Yáñez
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Pharmacokinetics of a Long-lasting, Highly Concentrated Buprenorphine Solution after Subcutaneous Administration in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Alexis L Mackiewicz; Gregory W Salyards; Heather K Knych; Ashley E Hill; Kari L Christe
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Evaluation of Pain Assessment Techniques and Analgesia Efficacy in a Female Guinea Pig (Cavia porcellus) Model of Surgical Pain.

Authors:  Vanessa L Oliver; Stephanie Athavale; Katherine E Simon; Lon V Kendall; Jean A Nemzek; Jennifer L Lofgren
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  High-sensitivity analysis of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine glucuronide, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Karen J Regina; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.205

5.  Analgesics in patients with hepatic impairment: pharmacology and clinical implications.

Authors:  Marija Bosilkovska; Bernhard Walder; Marie Besson; Youssef Daali; Jules Desmeules
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Pharmacokinetics of 2 formulations of buprenorphine in macaques (Macaca mulatta and Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Lisa C Halliday; David E Moody; Wenfang B Fang; Matthew Lindeblad; Jeffrey D Fortman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Effect of telaprevir on the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in volunteers on stable buprenorphine/naloxone maintenance therapy.

Authors:  Xia Luo; Jose Trevejo; Rolf P G van Heeswijk; Frances Smith; Varun Garg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine following intravenous and intramuscular administration in male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  K R Kelly; B H Pypendop; K L Christe
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 1.786

9.  Pharmacokinetics of Single-Dose Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Injections of Buprenorphine in Common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Niora J Fabian; David E Moody; Olga Averin; Wenfang B Fang; Morgan Jamiel; James G Fox; Monika A Burns; Jennifer L Haupt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Do drug treatment variables predict cognitive performance in multidrug-treated opioid-dependent patients? A regression analysis study.

Authors:  Pekka Rapeli; Carola Fabritius; Hely Kalska; Hannu Alho
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2012-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.