| Literature DB >> 17919330 |
Yumiko H Nishimura1, Masako Ono-Kihara, Jagdis C Mohith, Renaud Ngmansun, Takayuki Homma, Ralph J Diclemente, Delia L Lang, Masahiro Kihara.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the Indian Ocean region, including Mauritius. National records suggest a prevalence of HIV in Mauritius of < 1% in the general population, which is one of the lowest prevalence rates in southern Africa. However, HIV-positive cases have been increasing recently in Mauritius. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in January 2003 to assess the prevalence of HIVrelated sexual behaviors and their correlates among young people aged 15-24 years in Mauritius.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17919330 PMCID: PMC2147008 DOI: 10.1186/1472-698X-7-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights ISSN: 1472-698X
Demographic characteristics of participants by gender
| Male ( | Female ( | |
| Age group | ||
| 15–19 | 53.1 | 63.3 |
| 20–24 | 46.9 | 36.7 |
| Mean age | 19.2 ( | 18.6 ( |
| Religion | ||
| Hindu | 55.7 | 52.6 |
| Muslim | 20.5 | 20.6 |
| Christian | 22.8 | 25.8 |
| Other/No religion | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Education status | ||
| Currently attending school | 41.2 | 48.5 |
| Completed > 3 years in secondary | 39.6 | 38.2 |
| Completed ≤ 3 years in secondary | 19.2 | 13.0 |
| Never attended school | 0 | 0.3 |
| Geographic region of residence | ||
| Urban | 42.8 | 42.9 |
| Rural | 57.2 | 57.1 |
| Work experience in the previous 12 months | ||
| Full time | 45.8 | 29.9 |
| Part time | 19.5 | 12.7 |
| Did not work | 34.7 | 57.4 |
| Monthly personal expenditure (in Rupees)a | ||
| High | 65.4 | 48.7 |
| Low | 34.6 | 51.3 |
| Mean expenditure | 1662.5 (SE 75.68) | 1307.8 (SE 93.62) |
SE, standard error.
a. Median split of total sample spending pattern: "Low," < 1000; "High," ≥ 1000; n = 574 for males and n = 561 for females.
Prevalence of sexual behavior by gender
| Male % (95% CI) | Female % (95% CI) | ||
| Ever had sexa | 30.9(25.8–36.5) | 9.7(6.5–14.0) | 0.001 (51.53**) |
| Mean age at first sexual encounterb | 17.4 ( | 17.8 ( | 0.362 |
| Mean age of first partnerb | 18.1 ( | 21.4 ( | 0.001 |
| Used condom at first sexual encounterb | 41.1 (31.9–51.1) | 32.0 (18.7–49.0) | 0.277 (1.21) |
| Had multiple sexual partnersb | 65.0 (56.8–72.5) | 32.0 (21.5–44.8) | 0.001 (14.83**) |
| Had sex in the past 12 monthsb | 71.3 (63.5–78.1) | 75.1 (57.4–87.1) | 0.688 (0.16) |
| Used a condom at last sexual encounterc | 49.4 (38.2–60.6) | 28.8 (12.1–54.2) | 0.079 (3.23) |
| Always used a condomc | 35.7 (25.6–47.4) | 24.5 (10.1–48.4) | 0.274 (1.23) |
CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.
a. Among total respondents (n = 575 for males and n = 566 for females).
b. Among people who had ever had sex (n = 183 for males and n = 55 for females).
c. Among people who had sex with noncommercial sex partners in the past 12 months (n = 123 for males and n = 40 for females).
d. Chi-square test for the percentage and t-test for the mean.
e. ** P < 0.01.
Bivariate and multivariate association between dichotomous correlates and ever having had sex (male and female)
| Correlate | Male | Female | ||||||||||
| Bivariate | Multivariate a | Bivariate | Multivariate a | |||||||||
| Percent reporting ever had sex | Prevalence ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | Percent reporting ever had sex | Prevalence ratio (95%CI) | Adjusted odds ratio (95%CI) | |||||||
| Age group (years) | ||||||||||||
| Older (20–24) | 273 | 42.5 | 2.06 | 0.001 | 1.50 | 0.131 | 206 | 14.5 | 2.12 | 0.013 | 1.18 | 0.705 |
| Younger (15–19) | 302 | 20.7 | (1.63–2.60) | (43.25**) | (0.88–2.56) | 360 | 6.9 | (1.20–3.75) | (6.73*) | (0.49–2.89) | ||
| Geographic area | ||||||||||||
| Urban | 236 | 30.3 | 0.97 | 0.847 | 0.74 | 0.195 | 232 | 11.4 | 1.35 | 0.426 | 0.80 | 0.630 |
| Rural | 339 | 31.4 | (0.67–1.38) | (0.04) | (0.47–1.17) | 334 | 8.4 | (0.64–2.86) | (0.65) | (0.32–1.99) | ||
| Currently in school | ||||||||||||
| No | 337 | 41.8 | 2.74 | 0.001 | 1.75 | 0.104 | 288 | 15.3 | 4.08 | 0.001 | 4.28 | 0.001 |
| Yes | 238 | 15.3 | (1.82–4.13) | (44.13**) | (0.89–3.47) | 276 | 3.8 | (1.93–8.62) | (16.51**) | (1.84–9.97) | ||
| Work experience | ||||||||||||
| Ever worked | 376 | 41.7 | 3.92 | 0.001 | 3.14 | 0.003 | 236 | 15.9 | 3.13 | 0.002 | 1.17 | 0.701 |
| Never worked | 199 | 10.6 | (2.31–6.67) | (48.48**) | (1.50–6.54) | 330 | 5.1 | (1.58–6.22) | (10.31**) | (0.52–2.63) | ||
| Religion | ||||||||||||
| Non-Christian | 442 | 25.3 | 0.51 | 0.001 | 0.27 | 0.001 | 422 | 3.6 | 0.13 | 0.001 | 0.15 | 0.001 |
| Christian | 133 | 49.8 | (0.39–0.66) | (18.53**) | (0.16–0.46) | 144 | 27.0 | (0.07–0.26) | (24.46**) | (0.07–0.34) | ||
| Have a mobile phone | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 318 | 36.8 | 1.55 | 0.001 | 1.46 | 0.119 | 245 | 12.6 | 1.75 | 0.048 | 1.53 | 0.250 |
| No | 257 | 23.8 | (1.21–1.98) | (14.26**) | (0.90–2.36) | 321 | 7.2 | (0.98–3.12) | (4.13*) | (0.73–3.19) | ||
| Ever been to a nightclub | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 254 | 51.9 | 3.59 | 0.001 | 3.07 | 0.001 | 82 | 28.5 | 4.67 | 0.010 | 3.14 | 0.027 |
| No | 321 | 14.4 | (2.58–5.01) | (83.69**) | (1.74–5.42) | 484 | 6.1 | (2.49–8.78) | (7.30*) | (1.15–8.56) | ||
| Ever watched a pornographic film | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 404 | 36.5 | 2.10 | 0.001 | 1.50 | 0.123 | 75 | 15.1 | 1.70 | 0.220 | N/A | N/A |
| No | 171 | 17.4 | (1.50–2.96) | (26.90**) | (0.89–2.50) | 491 | 8.9 | (0.82–3.56) | (1.54) | |||
| Ever used the Internet | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 228 | 27.2 | 0.82 | 0.085 | 1.15 | 0.652 | 224 | 7.5 | 0.66 | 0.319 | N/A | N/A |
| No | 347 | 33.2 | (0.66–1.02) | (3.10) | (0.62–2.13) | 342 | 11.2 | (0.28–1.59) | (1.02) | |||
| Ever drank alcohol in the past 12 months | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 252 | 45.4 | 2.39 | 0.001 | 1.56 | 0.076 | 130 | 23.9 | 4.38 | 0.001 | 2.81 | 0.014 |
| No | 323 | 19.0 | (1.90–3.01) | (58.71**) | (0.95–2.54) | 436 | 5.5 | (2.42–7.93) | (12.23**) | (1.24–6.37) | ||
| Ever used marijuana | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 64 | 68.9 | 2.59 | 0.001 | 3.09 | 0.001 | 5 | 48.8 | 5.25 | 0.124 | N/A | N/A |
| No | 511 | 26.6 | (1.99–3.37) | (24.09**) | (1.73–5.51) | 561 | 9.3 | (1.97–13.98) | (2.46) | |||
N/A, not applicable; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
a. Three basic sociodemographic variables (age group, geographic area, religion) and variables that attained P < 0.10 in bivariate analyses were entered into the logistic regression model.
b. * P < 0.05. **P < 0.01.
Bivariate and multivariate association between dichotomous correlates and engaging in sex without a condom at the last sexual encounter with a noncommercial partner
| Correlate | Bivariate | Multivariate a | ||||
| n | Percent reporting condom nonuse at last sexual encounter | Prevalence ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | |||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | 40 | 71.2 | 1.41 | 0.079 | 3.09 | 0.056 |
| Male | 123 | 50.6 | (0.94–2.11) | (3.23) | (0.97–9.85) | |
| Age group (years) | ||||||
| Older (20–24) | 104 | 61.6 | 1.45 | 0.034 | 2.68 | 0.051 |
| Younger (15–19) | 59 | 42.5 | (1.00–2.11) | (4.78*) | (1.00–7.23) | |
| Geographic area | ||||||
| Urban | 66 | 45.0 | 0.73 | 0.065 | 0.95 | 0.893 |
| Rural | 97 | 62.0 | (0.53–0.99) | (3.56) | (0.43–2.11) | |
| Currently in school | ||||||
| No | 127 | 58.1 | 1.42 | 0.051 | 0.99 | 0.984 |
| Yes | 36 | 40.9 | (0.97–2.09) | (4.02) | (0.27–3.56) | |
| Work experience | ||||||
| Ever worked | 132 | 55.8 | 1.16 | 0.520 | N/A | N/A |
| Never worked | 31 | 48.2 | (0.74–1.81) | (0.42) | ||
| Perceived difficulty in obtaining a condom | ||||||
| High | 23 | 80.4 | 1.58 | 0.017 | 4.17 | 0.084 |
| Low | 138 | 50.9 | (1.18–2.12) | (6.17*) | (0.82–21.14) | |
| Self-efficacy of using a condom with a new partner | ||||||
| Low | 28 | 88.5 | 1.83 | 0.001 | 3.11 | 0.066 |
| High | 133 | 48.3 | (1.46–2.30) | (27.38**) | (0.93–10.41) | |
| Confidence to refuse sex without condom | ||||||
| Low | 86 | 60.4 | 1.28 | 0.111 | N/A | N/A |
| High | 75 | 47.2 | (0.95–1.72) | (2.64) | ||
| Used a condom at first sexual encounter | ||||||
| No | 103 | 78.3 | 3.75 | 0.001 | 12.92 | 0.001 |
| Yes | 60 | 20.9 | (2.34–6.01) | (38.64**) | (4.96–33.62) | |
| Had more than one sexual partner | ||||||
| Yes | 111 | 54.4 | 0.99 | 0.958 | N/A | N/A |
| No | 52 | 54.9 | (0.74–1.34) | (0.00) | ||
| Effectiveness of condom in HIV prevention | ||||||
| Low | 20 | 79.1 | 1.54 | 0.029 | 1.94 | 0.398 |
| High | 143 | 51.4 | (1.13–2.10) | (5.06*) | (0.41–9.19) | |
| Effectiveness of having one faithful partner in HIV prevention | ||||||
| Low | 60 | 58.7 | 1.13 | 0.454 | N/A | N/A |
| High | 103 | 52.0 | (0.83–1.54) | (0.57) | ||
| Ever heard of PILS (NGO) | ||||||
| No | 66 | 66.0 | 1.42 | 0.018 | 3.27 | 0.010 |
| Yes | 97 | 46.5 | (1.08–1.86) | (5.98*) | (1.35–7.90) | |
N/A, not applicable; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NGO, nongovernmental organization.
a. Three basic sociodemographic variables (gender, age group, and geographic area) and variables that attained P < 0.10 in the bivariate analyses were entered into the logistic regression model.
b. * P < 0.05. **P < 0.01.