Literature DB >> 17919253

Clinical performance of a self-etching and a total-etch adhesive system - 2-year results.

K Bekes1, L Boeckler, C R Gernhardt, H-G Schaller.   

Abstract

The purpose of this controlled prospective clinical study was to compare the clinical performance of the self-etching adhesive system AdheSE and the established total-etch adhesive system Excite in classes I and II cavities for a period of 2 years. Fifty patients participated in this study. Each received two restorations, one with AdheSE, one with Excite by one calibrated, non-blinded operator. The resin composite used to restore the teeth was Tetric Ceram HB. One calibrated, blinded clinician re-evaluated the restorations at baseline, after 6, 12 and 24 months after placement using the modified Ryge criteria. For this, vitality, post-operative sensitivity, visible marginal irregularity, marginal discolouration, secondary caries, surface texture, anatomic form and filling defect were considered. After 2 years, 67 restorations were reviewed in 34 patients. None of the teeth showed signs of secondary caries. Two teeth, one of each group, had to receive endodontic treatment because of pulp inflammation. All other teeth remained vital. Slight marginal discolourations were observed in six AdheSE restorations and three Excite restorations. These restorations were scored as Beta. After 2 years, an overall clinical success rate, summing up all the Alpha and Beta scores, of 97% was found, viewing both adhesive systems together. Statistic analysis using log-rank test showed no statistic differences in the overall survival rate between the two materials tested within the observation period. It can be concluded that both adhesive systems tested demonstrated very good clinical performance in the restoration of classes I and II cavities at the end of 2 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919253     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01745.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  6 in total

1.  Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  Márcia Rezende; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jadson Araújo da Silva; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.

Authors:  Bruno Baracco; M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Micro-tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems on sound dentin and resin-based composite: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Rashmirekha Mallick; Priyanka Sarangi; Sandhyarani Mohanty; Subasish Behera; Soumyaranjan Nanda; Sukanta Kumar Satapathy
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

5.  Adhesion to primary and permanent dentin and a simple model approach.

Authors:  Deniz C Can-Karabulut; Firdevs Tulga Oz; Baris Karabulut; Inci Batmaz; Ozlem Ilk
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2009-01

6.  Knowledge and Attitudes of Dentists toward Adhesive System Selection: A Cross-sectional Study from Palestine.

Authors:  Naji Ziad Arandi; Mohammad Thabet
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.