Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter.

The purpose of this study was to compare the applicability of two shade-matching approaches: Vintage Halo shade guide (visual method) and Shofu ShadeEye NCC colorimeter (instrumental method). Twenty participants' maxillary left central incisors were evaluated. Corresponding metal ceramic crowns were fabricated with each shade-matching approach. The colour distributions (L*, a* and b*) of the middle third region of each tooth and corresponding metal ceramic crowns were spectrophotometrically assessed. The colour difference (DeltaE) and colour distributions (DeltaL*, Deltaa* and Deltab*) between the tooth and the corresponding crowns were calculated. We found that the colour differences of both groups fell within the clinical unacceptable range (DeltaE > 2.75). Regarding DeltaE and the three colour distributions, no significant difference was found, expect for a* (P < 0.01). The shade matching difficulty degree was analysed through the agreements of visual shade selection. Within easy matching cases, the instrumental method achieved better results (P = 0.041). In conclusion, it is suggested that the reliability of shade matching can be ensured by neither the colorimeter nor the visual approach. However, the colorimeter can achieve better results within easy matching cases.