Literature DB >> 17918402

New methods for quantifying the spatial storage effect: an illustration with desert annuals.

Anna L W Sears1, Peter Chesson.   

Abstract

Recent theory supports the long-held proposition that coexistence is promoted by species-specific responses to a spatially varying environment. The underlying coexistence mechanism, the spatial storage effect, can be quantified by the covariance between response to the environment and competition. Here, "competition" is generalized to encompass similar processes such as facilitation and apparent competition. In the present study, we use a model field system of desert annual plants to demonstrate this method and to provide insight into the dynamics of the field system. Specifically, we use neighborhood competition experiments to quantify the spatial storage effect and compare it to the separate (but not mutually exclusive) process of neighborhood-scale resource partitioning. As our basic experimental design has been used frequently in community ecology, these methods can be applied to many existing data sets, as well as future field studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17918402     DOI: 10.1890/06-0645.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  13 in total

Review 1.  Within-host competitive interactions as a mechanism for the maintenance of parasite diversity.

Authors:  Farrah Bashey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evidence for the equal resilience of Triodia spp. (Poaceae), from different functional groups, to frequent fire dating back to the late Pleistocene.

Authors:  G Armstrong
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Spatial storage effect promotes biodiversity during adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Jiaqi Tan; Jennifer B Rattray; Xian Yang; Lin Jiang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Turbulent dispersal promotes species coexistence.

Authors:  Heather A Berkley; Bruce E Kendall; Satoshi Mitarai; David A Siegel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness.

Authors:  Santiago Soliveres; Fernando T Maestre; Werner Ulrich; Peter Manning; Steffen Boch; Matthew A Bowker; Daniel Prati; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; José L Quero; Ingo Schöning; Antonio Gallardo; Wolfgang Weisser; Jörg Müller; Stephanie A Socher; Miguel García-Gómez; Victoria Ochoa; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Markus Fischer; Eric Allan
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Long-term coexistence of rotifer cryptic species.

Authors:  Javier Montero-Pau; Eloisa Ramos-Rodríguez; Manuel Serra; Africa Gómez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resource competition and coexistence in heterogeneous metacommunities: many-species coexistence is unlikely to be facilitated by spatial variation in resources.

Authors:  Donald R Schoolmaster
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Direct and indirect effects of climate change on a prairie plant community.

Authors:  Peter B Adler; James Leiker; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Environmental correlates of species rank - abundance distributions in global drylands.

Authors:  Werner Ulrich; Santiago Soliveres; Andrew D Thomas; Andrew J Dougill; Fernando T Maestre
Journal:  Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Niche partitioning between close relatives suggests trade-offs between adaptation to local environments and competition.

Authors:  Megan L Peterson; Kevin J Rice; Jason P Sexton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.