Literature DB >> 17918227

Mortality among workers at the Savannah River Site.

David B Richardson1, Steve Wing, Susanne Wolf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Workers employed at the Savannah River Site (SRS) were potentially exposed to a range of chemical and physical hazards, many of which are poorly characterized. We therefore compared the observed deaths among workers to expectations based upon death rates for referent populations.
METHODS: The cohort included 18,883 SRS workers hired between 1950 and 1986. Vital status and cause of death information were ascertained through 2002. Sex-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were computed using U.S. and South Carolina mortality rates. SMRs were tabulated separately for monthly-, weekly-, and hourly-paid men.
RESULTS: Males had fewer deaths from all causes [SMR=0.80, 90% confidence interval (CI): 0.78, 0.82], all cancers (SMR=0.85, 90% CI: 0.81, 0.89), and lung cancer (SMR=0.88, 90% CI: 0.82, 0.95) than expected based upon US mortality rates. The SMR for cancer of the pleura was 4.25 (90% CI: 1.99, 7.97) for men. The SMR for leukemia was greater than unity for monthly-paid (SMR=1.33, 90% CI: 0.88, 1.93) and hourly-paid (SMR=1.36, 90% CI: 1.02, 1.78) men. Female workers had fewer deaths from all causes (SMR=0.75, 90% CI: 0.69, 0.82) than expected, but more deaths than expected from cancer of the kidney (SMR=2.58, 90% CI: 1.21, 4.84) and skin (SMR=3.90, 90% CI: 2.11, 6.61).
CONCLUSIONS: While the observed numbers of deaths in most categories of cause of death were less than expected, there are greater than expected numbers of deaths due to cancer of the pleura and leukemia, particularly among hourly-paid male workers. It is plausible that occupational hazards, including asbestos and ionizing radiation, contribute to these excesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17918227     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  4 in total

1.  Inequalities in the nuclear age: impact of race and gender on radiation exposure at the Savannah River Site (1951-1999).

Authors:  Kim A Angelon-Gaetz; David B Richardson; Steve Wing
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2010

2.  Integrating informative priors from experimental research with Bayesian methods: an example from radiation epidemiology.

Authors:  Ghassan Hamra; David Richardson; Richard Maclehose; Steve Wing
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Work-related leukemia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ioannis Polychronakis; George Dounias; Vasilios Makropoulos; Elena Riza; Athena Linos
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  Occupational exposure to asbestos and ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Constanza Camargo; Leslie T Stayner; Kurt Straif; Margarita Reina; Umaima Al-Alem; Paul A Demers; Philip J Landrigan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.