Literature DB >> 17917902

Lack of conformity between Indian classroom furniture and student dimensions: proposed future seat/table dimensions.

C S Savanur1, C R Altekar, A De.   

Abstract

Children spend one-quarter of a day in school. Of this, 60-80% of time is spent in the classroom. Classroom features, such as workspace and personal space play an important role in children's growth and performance as this age marks the period of anatomical, physiological and psychological developments. Since the classroom is an influential part of a student's life the present study focused on classroom furniture in relation to students' workspace and personal space requirements and standards and was conducted in five schools at Mumbai, India. Dimensions of 104 items of furniture (chairs and desks) were measured as were 42 anthropometric dimensions of 225 students from grade six to grade nine (age: 10-14 years). Questionnaire responses of 292 students regarding the perceived adequacy of their classroom furniture were collected. Results indicated that the seat and desk heights (450 mm, 757 mm respectively) were higher than the comparable students' anthropometric dimensions and that of the recommendations of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (340 + 3 mm, 380 + 3 mm seat-heights, 580 + 3 mm 640 + 3 mm desk-heights) as well as Time-Saver Standards (TSS) (381.0 mm seat-height and 660.4 mm desk-height). The depth of the seats and the desks (299 mm, 319 mm, respectively) were less than comparable students' anthropometric dimensions and the recommendations of BIS (IS 4837: 1990). Students reported discomfort in shoulder, wrist, knee and ankle regions. Based on the students' anthropometric data, proposed future designs with fixed table-heights and adjustable seat-heights along with footrests were identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17917902     DOI: 10.1080/00140130701587350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Back pain in elementary schoolchildren is related to screen habits.

Authors:  Erivelton Fernandes França; Michel Monteiro Macedo; Fernando Francisco Pazello Mafra; Gabrielle Mitico Miyake; Romildo Torres da Silva; Tania Regina de França; Thyago Ribeiro Dos Santos; João Pedro da Silva Junior; Victor Keihan Rodrigues Matsudo; Nelson Morini Junior; Eduardo Natali Della Valentina; Fábio Dupart Nascimento; Rodrigo Álvaro Brandão Lopes Martins
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2020-07-29

2.  Development and validation of instrument for ergonomic evaluation of tablet arm chairs.

Authors:  Adriana Seára Tirloni; Diogo Cunha Dos Reis; Antonio Cezar Bornia; Dalton Francisco de Andrade; Adriano Ferreti Borgatto; Antônio Renato Pereira Moro
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.068

3.  Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach to compare types of classroom furniture considering mismatches for anthropometric measures of university students.

Authors:  Pooya Khoshabi; Erfan Nejati; Seyyede Fatemeh Ahmadi; Ali Chegini; Ahmad Makui; Rouzbeh Ghousi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Classroom Furniture Mismatch and Back Pain Among Adolescent School-Children in Abha City, Southwestern Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdullah Assiri; Ahmed A Mahfouz; Nabil J Awadalla; Ahmed Y Abolyazid; Medhat Shalaby; Ahmed Abogamal; Abdullah Alsabaani; Fatima Riaz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Identification of factors related to behaviors associated with musculoskeletal pain among elementary students.

Authors:  Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai; Elham Gheysvandi; Akram Karimi-Shahanjarini; Leili Tapak; Rashid Heidarimoghadam; Iman Dianat
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Validation of Two Instruments for the Correct Allocation of School Furniture in Secondary Schools to Prevent Back Pain.

Authors:  Alfonso Gutiérrez-Santiago; Iván Prieto-Lage; José María Cancela-Carral; Adrián Paramés-González
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.