| Literature DB >> 17917318 |
Keiko Hosohata1, Masahiro Kikuya, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Hirohito Metoki, Kei Asayama, Ryusuke Inoue, Taku Obara, Junichiro Hashimoto, Kazuhito Totsune, Haruhisa Hoshi, Hiroshi Satoh, Yutaka Imai.
Abstract
To assess the reproducibility of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) during sleep as measured using a self-measurement device at home, we obtained repeated nocturnal home BP at 0200 h and quality of sleep assessment from a diary in 556 subjects (71% women, 62.4+/-11.1 years) in the general population. We used an Omron device (HEM-747IC-N, Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), with which the time and frequency of monitoring can be preset and the readings stored. The mean+/-SD of the difference between test-retest BP measurements was 0.7+/-15.1 mmHg systolic and 0.2+/-9.7 mmHg diastolic with a mean interval of 5.9 days. The absolute differences were greater than 10 mmHg in 261 (46.9%) subjects for systolic and 145 (26.0%) subjects for diastolic. There was no evidence of regression to the mean in nocturnal measurements over at least three nights (n=390, p>0.22). The differences (the first minus the second measurement) were large in subjects who experienced sleep disturbance only in the first (n=64, 2.3+/-13.6 mmHg and 1.6+/-9.6 mmHg for systolic and diastolic, respectively) or second sessions (n=56, -4.1+/-16.4 mmHg and -2.5+/-11.4 mmHg) compared with the subjects without sleep disturbance (n=66, 1.5+/-17.8 mmHg and 0.8+/-10.3 mmHg) and those with sleep disturbance (n=370, 0.9+/-14.5 mmHg and 0.2+/-9.3 mmHg) in both sessions. In conclusion, the reproducibility of single nocturnal BP as assessed using a self-measurement device at home was not good, especially for subjects who experienced different quality of sleep in each session. To evaluate nocturnal BP using a self-measurement device, estimation of quality of sleep is indispensable.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17917318 DOI: 10.1291/hypres.30.707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hypertens Res ISSN: 0916-9636 Impact factor: 3.872