Literature DB >> 17916891

Effects of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) standard on rates of machinery-related fatal occupational injury.

Maria T Bulzacchelli1, Jon S Vernick, Daniel W Webster, Peter S J Lees.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the United States' federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration's control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) standard on rates of machinery-related fatal occupational injury. The standard, which took effect in 1990, requires employers in certain industries to establish an energy control program and sets minimum criteria for energy control procedures, training, inspections, and hardware.
DESIGN: An interrupted time-series design was used to determine the standard's effect on fatality rates. Machinery-related fatalities, obtained from the National Traumatic Occupational Fatalities surveillance system for 1980 through 2001, were used as a proxy for lockout/tagout-related fatalities. Linear regression was used to control for changes in demographic and economic factors.
RESULTS: The average annual crude rate of machinery-related fatalities in manufacturing changed little from 1980 to 1989, but declined by 4.59% per year from 1990 to 2001. However, when controlling for demographic and economic factors, the regression model estimate of the standard's effect is a small, non-significant increase of 0.05 deaths per 100 000 production worker full-time equivalents (95% CI -0.14 to 0.25). When fatality rates in comparison groups that should not have been affected by the standard are incorporated into the analysis, there is still no significant change in the rate of machinery-related fatalities in manufacturing.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that the lockout/tagout standard decreased fatality rates relative to other trends in occupational safety over the study period. A possible explanation is voluntary use of lockout/tagout by some employers before introduction of the standard and low compliance by other employers after.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17916891      PMCID: PMC2610620          DOI: 10.1136/ip.2007.015677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  6 in total

1.  Healthy by law? The influence of labor and employment law on workers' health.

Authors:  P N Ossorio
Journal:  J Gend Specif Med       Date:  2000-04

2.  Effect of state workplace safety laws on occupational injury rates.

Authors:  M W Smitha; K A Kirk; K R Oestenstad; K C Brown; S D Lee
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Economic and demographic aspects of the occupational injury problem.

Authors:  J R Chelius
Journal:  Q Rev Econ Bus       Date:  1979

4.  Occupational safety and health.

Authors:  M Berkowitz
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  1979-05

5.  Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. II.

Authors:  J DURBIN; G S WATSON
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  The impact of overtime and long work hours on occupational injuries and illnesses: new evidence from the United States.

Authors:  A E Dembe; J B Erickson; R G Delbos; S M Banks
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.402

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Injury and illness among onshore workers in Alaska's seafood processing industry: Analysis of workers' compensation claims, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Laura N Syron; Devin L Lucas; Viktor E Bovbjerg; Laurel D Kincl
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.