BACKGROUND: Although evidence supports the efficacy of reducing immunosuppression for transplant-associated skin cancer, clinical thresholds for and risks associated with reduction are not well defined. OBJECTIVES: In this study, experienced transplant physicians were surveyed regarding appropriate thresholds for consideration of reduction of immunosuppression and the likelihood of rejection and allograft compromise associated with various levels of reduction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two transplant physicians reviewed 13 hypothetical patient scenarios with graduated morbidity and mortality risk and provided opinions on the degree of reduction of immunosuppression that was warranted and the risks associated with various degrees of reduction. RESULTS: Renal, liver and cardiac transplant physicians generally concurred on the level of reduction of immunosuppression warranted by various degrees of skin cancer. As morbidity and mortality from skin cancer increased, physicians were more likely to accept risk to allograft function from more aggressive reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of immunosuppression is considered a reasonable adjuvant strategy in recipients of solid organ transplants who have substantial morbidity and mortality risk from skin cancer. Physicians are willing to accept an increased risk of allograft compromise when confronted by severe or extensive skin cancer. Further research is needed to define the precise correlation among levels of reduction of immunosuppression, therapeutic efficacy, and concomitant risks.
BACKGROUND: Although evidence supports the efficacy of reducing immunosuppression for transplant-associated skin cancer, clinical thresholds for and risks associated with reduction are not well defined. OBJECTIVES: In this study, experienced transplant physicians were surveyed regarding appropriate thresholds for consideration of reduction of immunosuppression and the likelihood of rejection and allograft compromise associated with various levels of reduction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two transplant physicians reviewed 13 hypothetical patient scenarios with graduated morbidity and mortality risk and provided opinions on the degree of reduction of immunosuppression that was warranted and the risks associated with various degrees of reduction. RESULTS: Renal, liver and cardiac transplant physicians generally concurred on the level of reduction of immunosuppression warranted by various degrees of skin cancer. As morbidity and mortality from skin cancer increased, physicians were more likely to accept risk to allograft function from more aggressive reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of immunosuppression is considered a reasonable adjuvant strategy in recipients of solid organ transplants who have substantial morbidity and mortality risk from skin cancer. Physicians are willing to accept an increased risk of allograft compromise when confronted by severe or extensive skin cancer. Further research is needed to define the precise correlation among levels of reduction of immunosuppression, therapeutic efficacy, and concomitant risks.
Authors: Jerry D Brewer; Oscar R Colegio; P Kim Phillips; Randall K Roenigk; M Amanda Jacobs; Diederik Van de Beek; Ross A Dierkhising; Walter K Kremers; Christopher G A McGregor; Clark C Otley Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Axel Sahovaler; Rohin J Krishnan; David H Yeh; Qi Zhou; David Palma; Kevin Fung; John Yoo; Anthony Nichols; S Danielle MacNeil Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 6.223