INTRODUCTION: The novel ultrasonic osteotomy technique (Piezosurgery) is an alternative to conventional osteotomy devices. The aim of the present study was to carry out morphological comparison of the bone surface using conventional osteotomy techniques in comparison to the rather new ultrasonic osteotomy technique by means of a reflected-light microscopic examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the sacrifice of 12 rabbits, 24 standardized bone samples were removed from the skull. The osteotomy devices used were a rotating instrument (Lindemann bur), an oscillating micro-saw, and an ultrasonic osteotomy device (Piezosurgery) with insert tips OT6 and OT7. The times needed for osteotomy were measured. The bone surfaces were examined using a reflected-light microscope with a magnification of 40x and 100x. RESULTS: Osteotomy with Piezosurgery is significantly more time consuming than osteotomy with conventional methods (p<0.05). Following osteotomy with the ultrasonic device, the reflected-light microscopic examinations of the unmodified bone samples revealed typical bone structure of the calvaria, including compacta externa, diploe and compacta interna. On the contrary, following osteotomy with the conventional devices, the diploe structure presented distinct modifications. The cancellous spaces were filled with bone debris, and the cancellous structure was demolished. The samples prepared by the micro-saw technique showed a superficially condensed and grooved surface. CONCLUSION: In the present study, well-defined differences were observed following osteotomy with conventional devices and osteotomy with the ultrasonic device. The integrity of the bony structure observed after the ultrasonic technique could benefit the bone healing process. Further studies dealing with the bone healing process after using different osteotomy techniques are recommended.
INTRODUCTION: The novel ultrasonic osteotomy technique (Piezosurgery) is an alternative to conventional osteotomy devices. The aim of the present study was to carry out morphological comparison of the bone surface using conventional osteotomy techniques in comparison to the rather new ultrasonic osteotomy technique by means of a reflected-light microscopic examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the sacrifice of 12 rabbits, 24 standardized bone samples were removed from the skull. The osteotomy devices used were a rotating instrument (Lindemann bur), an oscillating micro-saw, and an ultrasonic osteotomy device (Piezosurgery) with insert tips OT6 and OT7. The times needed for osteotomy were measured. The bone surfaces were examined using a reflected-light microscope with a magnification of 40x and 100x. RESULTS: Osteotomy with Piezosurgery is significantly more time consuming than osteotomy with conventional methods (p<0.05). Following osteotomy with the ultrasonic device, the reflected-light microscopic examinations of the unmodified bone samples revealed typical bone structure of the calvaria, including compacta externa, diploe and compacta interna. On the contrary, following osteotomy with the conventional devices, the diploe structure presented distinct modifications. The cancellous spaces were filled with bone debris, and the cancellous structure was demolished. The samples prepared by the micro-saw technique showed a superficially condensed and grooved surface. CONCLUSION: In the present study, well-defined differences were observed following osteotomy with conventional devices and osteotomy with the ultrasonic device. The integrity of the bony structure observed after the ultrasonic technique could benefit the bone healing process. Further studies dealing with the bone healing process after using different osteotomy techniques are recommended.