Literature DB >> 1791528

Role of hydrogen bonding in general anesthesia.

M H Abraham1, W R Lieb, N P Franks.   

Abstract

The importance of hydrogen bonding in determining the potency of a general anesthetic is controversial. In order to investigate the role of hydrogen bonding further, we have used a multiple linear regression approach to quantify the relative importance of various physical properties of an anesthetic molecule (i.e., its ability to donate or accept a hydrogen bond, its dipolarity and polarizability, and its size) in determining its anesthetic potency. For comparison, we have applied the same approach to partitioning between water and three simple, but contrasting solvents (n-octanol, n-hexadecane, and N,N-dimethylacetamide) and to inhibition of an enzyme (firefly luciferase) which mimics many of the properties of general anesthetic target sites in animals. We present equations which accurately predict potencies (over many orders of magnitude) for producing general anesthesia and inhibiting the firefly luciferase enzyme. We find that the aqueous potency (defined as the reciprocal of the aqueous EC50 concentration) of a molecule as a general anesthetic or an inhibitor of luciferase is determined overwhelmingly by its size (which increases potency) and its ability to accept a hydrogen bond (which decreases potency), but only marginally by its ability to donate a hydrogen bond or by its dipolarity and polarizability. We conclude that general anesthetic target sites in animals must have, in addition to their overall hydrophobicity, a polar component which is a relatively poor hydrogen bond donor, but which can accept a hydrogen bond about as well as water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1791528     DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600800802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  9 in total

1.  Structural basis for the inhibition of firefly luciferase by a general anesthetic.

Authors:  N P Franks; A Jenkins; E Conti; W R Lieb; P Brick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Polarizability: a promising descriptor to study chemical-biological interactions.

Authors:  Hiteshi Tandon; Prabhat Ranjan; Tanmoy Chakraborty; Vandana Suhag
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Stereospecific dihaloalkane binding in a pH-sensitive cavity in cubic insulin crystals.

Authors:  O Gursky; E Fontano; B Bhyravbhatla; D L Caspar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  4D-QSAR analysis of a set of propofol analogues: mapping binding sites for an anesthetic phenol on the GABA(A) receptor.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski; Xuan Hong; A J Hopfinger; Neil L Harrison
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Actions of general anaesthetics on a neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in isolated identified neurones of Lymnaea stagnalis.

Authors:  D McKenzie; N P Franks; W R Lieb
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Monitoring the depth of anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bojan Musizza; Samo Ribaric
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Solvent effects on the structure-property relationship of anticonvulsant hydantoin derivatives: A solvatochromic analysis.

Authors:  Nemanja Trišović; Nataša Valentić; Gordana Ušćumlić
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Hydrocarbon molar water solubility predicts NMDA vs. GABAA receptor modulation.

Authors:  Robert J Brosnan; Trung L Pham
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 9.  The Molecular Mechanisms of Anesthetic Action: Updates and Cutting Edge Developments from the Field of Molecular Modeling.

Authors:  Edward J Bertaccini
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2010-07-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.