| Literature DB >> 17915031 |
Hiroshi Oyamada1, Atsuhiko Iijima, Akira Tanaka, Kazuhiko Ukai, Haruo Toda, Norihiro Sugita, Makoto Yoshizawa, Takehiko Bando.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Taking advantage of developed image technology, it is expected that image presentation would be utilized to promote health in the field of medical care and public health. To accumulate knowledge on biomedical effects induced by image presentation, an essential prerequisite for these purposes, studies on autonomic responses in more than one physiological system would be necessary. In this study, changes in parameters of the pupillary light reflex and cardiovascular reflex evoked by motion pictures were examined, which would be utilized to evaluate the effects of images, and to avoid side effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17915031 PMCID: PMC2093938 DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil ISSN: 1743-0003 Impact factor: 4.262
Figure 1The ρmax of a subject obtained in the consecutive three days (day 1, day 2 and day 3) during video presentation of the movie D is shown respectively. The mean and SE of ρmax obtained in the rest before and after presentation of the movies ρmax_control are also shown (control, n = 6).
The pupil parameters and the scores of questionnaire obtained before (control) and after presentation of movies A, D and R
| 6.62 ± 0.89 | 5.25 ± 1.03 | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 303 ± 29 | 3.99 ± 1.29 | 1.14 ± 0.36 | 32.1 ± 11.3 | 1.10 ± 0.24 | 32.4 ± 10.2 | |
| 5.95 ± 0.98** | 4.48 ± 1.06** | 0.25 ± 0.09* | 304 ± 28 | 4.33 ± 1.27 | 1.14 ± 0.42 | 34.8 ± 12.7 | 1.10 ± 0.27 | 36.1 ± 10.3* | |
| 6.08 ± 0.92** | 4.54 ± 0.93** | 0.26 ± 0.08** | 300 ± 32 | 4.35 ± 1.11 | 1.16 ± 0.48 | 32.3 ± 9.6 | 1.10 ± 0.20 | 38.0 ± 14.1** | |
| 6.15 ± 0.86** | 4.77 ± 0.92** | 0.23 ± 00.8 | 306 ± 33 | 4.02 ± 1.37 | 1.10 ± 0.43 | 32.2 ± 11.5 | 1.06 ± 0.18 | 36.7 ± 11.3* |
mean ± SD. D1: baseline pupil diameter just before light stimulation to induce the light reflex (mm), D2: pupil diameter at the peak of the light reflex (mm), CR: the amplitude of the pupillary light reflex (D1–D2) divided by D1, latency: the latency of the pupillary light reflex (msec), vc: the velocity of constriction (mm/sec), vd: the velocity of re-dilation (mm/sec), ac: the acceleration of the constriction (mm/sec2), peak time: time at the peak of the pupillary light reflex (sec), and the scores of the questionnaire. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01. Paired t-test (two-tailed).
Mean values of ρmax_control, ρmax_test, and ρmax_ratio are shown for each video movie (movie A, D and R)
| 0.65 ± 0.10 | 0.66 ± 0.13 | 1.03± 0.06 | |
| 0.66 ± 0.12 | 0.70 ± 0.08* | 1.11± 0.05 | |
| 0.66 ± 0.09 | 0.69 ± 0.12 | 1.08± 0.07 |
mean ± SD. *, p < 0.05. Paired t-test.
Correlation coefficient (Pearson) between CRratio and differences in the scores of questionnaire
| 0.059 | 0.799 | |
| -0.567** | 0.007 | |
| -0.590** | 0.005 |
**, p < 0.01. In the second column, the levels of significance are shown.
Figure 2Correlation of pupil and cardiovascular parameters with the scores of questionnaire. A-C. Correlation of CRratio with the differences in the scores of questionnaire when subjects watched the movies A, D and R, respectively, are shown. D-F. Correlation of ρmax_ratio with the differences in the scores of questionnaire when subjects watched the movies A, D and R, respectively, are shown.
Correlation coefficient (Pearson) between ρmax_ratio and differences in the scores of questionnaire. In the second column, the levels of significance are shown
| 032 | 0.161 | |
| 0.16 | 0.491 | |
| -0.42 | 0.059 |
Correlation coefficient (Pearson) between ρmax_ratio and CRratio. In the second column, the levels of significance are shown
| 0.07 | 0.77 | |
| 0.11 | 0.65 | |
| 0.21 | 0.37 |