Literature DB >> 17914106

DNA copy number status is a powerful predictor of poor survival in endocrine pancreatic tumor patients.

Y M H Jonkers1, S M H Claessen, A Perren, A M Schmitt, L J Hofland, W de Herder, R R de Krijger, A A J Verhofstad, A R Hermus, J A Kummer, B Skogseid, M Volante, A C Voogd, F C S Ramaekers, E J M Speel.   

Abstract

The clinical behavior of endocrine pancreatic tumors (EPTs) is difficult to predict in the absence of metastases or invasion to adjacent organs. Several markers have been indicated as potential predictors of metastatic disease, such as tumor size > or =2 cm, Ki67 proliferative index > or =2%, cytokeratin (CK) 19 status, and recently in insulinomas, chromosomal instability (CIN). The goal of this study was to evaluate the value of these markers, and in particular of the CIN, to predict tumor recurrence or progression and tumor-specific death, using a series of 47 insulinomas and 24 non-insulinoma EPTs. From these EPT cases, a genomic profile has been generated and follow-up data have been obtained. The proliferative index has been determined in 68 tumors and a CK19 expression pattern in 50 tumors. Results are statistically analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank statistic. General CIN, as well as specific chromosomal alterations such as 3p and 6q loss and 12q gain, turned out to be the most powerful indicators for poor tumor-free survival (P< or =0.0004) and tumor-specific death (P< or =0.0113) in insulinomas. The CIN, chromosome 7q gain, and a proliferative index > or =2% were reliable in predicting a poor tumor-free survival in non-insulinoma EPTs (P< or =0.0181, whereas CK19 expression was the most optimal predictor of tumor-specific death in these tumors. In conclusion, DNA copy number status is the most sensitive and efficient marker of adverse clinical outcome in insulinomas and of potential interest in non-insulinoma EPTs. As a consequence, this marker should be considered as a prognosticator to improve clinical diagnosis, most practically as a simple multi-target test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17914106     DOI: 10.1677/ERC-07-0111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer        ISSN: 1351-0088            Impact factor:   5.678


  9 in total

1.  Deletions of 11q22.3-q25 are associated with atypical lung carcinoids and poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  Dorian R A Swarts; Sandra M H Claessen; Yvonne M H Jonkers; Robert-Jan van Suylen; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Wouter W de Herder; Ronald R de Krijger; Egbert F Smit; Frederik B J M Thunnissen; Cornelis A Seldenrijk; Aryan Vink; Aurel Perren; Frans C S Ramaekers; Ernst-Jan M Speel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gut and pancreas: new insights.

Authors:  Guido Rindi; Bertram Wiedenmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Are We Undertreating Black Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors? Critical Analysis of Current Surveillance Guidelines by Race.

Authors:  Rui Zheng-Pywell; Alexandra Lopez-Aguiar; Ryan C Fields; Selwyn Vickers; Clayton Yates; Vikas Dudeja; Herbert Chen; Sushanth Reddy; Shishir K Maithel; J Bart Rose
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.532

4.  Alterations in polyadenylation and its implications for endocrine disease.

Authors:  Anders Rehfeld; Mireya Plass; Anders Krogh; Lennart Friis-Hansen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Prognostic Impact of Tumor Size on Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Recurrence May Have Racial Variance.

Authors:  Rui Zheng-Pywell; Amanda Fang; Ahmad AlKashash; Seifeldin Awad; Sushanth Reddy; Selwyn Vickers; Martin Heslin; Vikas Dudeja; Herbert Chen; John Bart Rose
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: functional pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes.

Authors:  Robert T Jensen; Guillaume Cadiot; Maria L Brandi; Wouter W de Herder; Gregory Kaltsas; Paul Komminoth; Jean-Yves Scoazec; Ramon Salazar; Alain Sauvanet; Reza Kianmanesh
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.914

7.  Clinical and Prognostic Significances of Cytokeratin 19 and KIT Expression in Surgically Resectable Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Eun-Mi Son; Joo Young Kim; Soyeon An; Ki-Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Eunsil Yu; Seung-Mo Hong
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2015-01-15

8.  Inherent variability of cancer-specific aneuploidy generates metastases.

Authors:  Mathew Bloomfield; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Prognostic significance of cytokeratin 19 expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong Cen; Jiang Chen; Zheyong Li; Jie Zhao; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.