Literature DB >> 17913978

Control of movement variability and the regulation of limb impedance.

Daniel R Lametti1, Guillaume Houle, David J Ostry.   

Abstract

Humans routinely make movements to targets that have different accuracy requirements in different directions. Examples extend from everyday occurrences such as grasping the handle of a coffee cup to the more refined instance of a surgeon positioning a scalpel. The attainment of accuracy in situations such as these might be related to the nervous system's capacity to regulate the limb's resistance to displacement, or impedance. To test this idea, subjects made movements from random starting locations to targets that had shape-dependent accuracy requirements. We used a robotic device to assess both limb impedance and patterns of movement variability just as the subject reached the target. We show that impedance increases in directions where required accuracy is high. Independent of target shape, patterns of limb stiffness are seen to predict spatial patterns of movement variability. The nervous system is thus seen to modulate limb impedance in entirely predictable environments to aid in the attainment of reaching accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17913978     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00970.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  22 in total

1.  Postural constraints on movement variability.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Proprioceptive feedback during point-to-point arm movements is tuned to the expected dynamics of the task.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Chuanxin M Niu; Cynthia Poon; Fabian J David; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of visual perturbations on the neural control of limb stiffness.

Authors:  Jeremy Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Nicole Malfait; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Origins of submovements during pointing movements.

Authors:  Laetitia Fradet; Gyusung Lee; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-11

5.  Changes in the referent body location and configuration may underlie human gait, as confirmed by findings of multi-muscle activity minimizations and phase resetting.

Authors:  Anatol G Feldman; Tal Krasovsky; Melanie C Baniña; Anouk Lamontagne; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Patterns of hypermetria and terminal cocontraction during point-to-point movements demonstrate independent action of trajectory and postural controllers.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Claude Ghez; Supriya Asnani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Influence of environmental stability on the regulation of end-point impedance during the maintenance of arm posture.

Authors:  Matthew A Krutky; Randy D Trumbower; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The influence of the indicator arm on end point distribution in proprioceptive localization with multi-joint arms.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Itaguchi; Kazuyoshi Fukuzawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How is precision regulated in maintaining trunk posture?

Authors:  Nienke W Willigenburg; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A computational model of limb impedance control based on principles of internal model uncertainty.

Authors:  Djordje Mitrovic; Stefan Klanke; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.