Literature DB >> 17913123

Willow on Yellowstone's northern range: evidence for a trophic cascade?

Hawthorne L Beyer1, Evelyn H Merrill, Nathan Varley, Mark S Boyce.   

Abstract

Reintroduction of wolves (Canis lupus) to Yellowstone National Park in 1995-1996 has been argued to promote a trophic cascade by altering elk (Cervus elaphus) density, habitat-selection patterns, and behavior that, in turn, could lead to changes within the plant communities used by elk. We sampled two species of willow (Salix boothii and S. geyeriana) on the northern winter range to determine whether (1) there was quantitative evidence of increased willow growth following wolf reintroduction, (2) browsing by elk affected willow growth, and (3) any increase in growth observed was greater than that expected by climatic and hydrological factors alone, thereby indicating a trophic cascade caused by wolves. Using stem sectioning techniques to quantify historical growth patterns we found an approximately twofold increase in stem growth-ring area following wolf reintroduction for both species of willow. This increase could not be explained by climate and hydrological factors alone; the presence of wolves on the landscape was a significant predictor of stem growth above and beyond these abiotic factors. Growth-ring area was positively correlated with the previous year's ring area and negatively correlated with the percentage of twigs browsed from the stem during the winter preceding growth, indicating that elk browse impeded stem growth. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade on Yellowstone's northern winter range following wolf reintroduction. We suggest that the community-altering effects of wolf restoration are an endorsement of ecological-process management in Yellowstone National Park.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17913123     DOI: 10.1890/06-1254.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  11 in total

1.  Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction.

Authors:  Kristin N Marshall; N Thompson Hobbs; David J Cooper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Glucocorticoid stress hormones and the effect of predation risk on elk reproduction.

Authors:  Scott Creel; John A Winnie; David Christianson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Keystone effects of an alien top-predator stem extinctions of native mammals.

Authors:  Mike Letnic; Freya Koch; Chris Gordon; Mathew S Crowther; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fungal phyllosphere communities are altered by indirect interactions among trophic levels.

Authors:  Jose L Perez; J Victor French; Kenneth R Summy; Anita Davelos Baines; Christopher R Little
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Wolves make roadways safer, generating large economic returns to predator conservation.

Authors:  Jennifer L Raynor; Corbett A Grainger; Dominic P Parker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sampling bias exaggerates a textbook example of a trophic cascade.

Authors:  Elaine M Brice; Eric J Larsen; Daniel R MacNulty
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 11.274

7.  Consequences of a refuge for the predator-prey dynamics of a wolf-elk system in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Joshua F Goldberg; Mark Hebblewhite; John Bardsley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What cues do ungulates use to assess predation risk in dense temperate forests?

Authors:  Dries P J Kuijper; Mart Verwijmeren; Marcin Churski; Adam Zbyryt; Krzysztof Schmidt; Bogumiła Jędrzejewska; Chris Smit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Behavioral responses of wolves to roads: scale-dependent ambivalence.

Authors:  Barbara Zimmermann; Lindsey Nelson; Petter Wabakken; Håkan Sand; Olof Liberg
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Climate change, biodiversity, ticks and tick-borne diseases: The butterfly effect.

Authors:  Filipe Dantas-Torres
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.674

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.