PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a software ablation program (Corneal Interactive Programmed Topographic Ablation [CIPTA]) that provides customized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct astigmatism after keratoplasty. METHODS: In this prospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series, 44 eyes underwent CIPTA for correction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Eighteen eyes were treated for regular astigmatism and 26 eyes were treated for irregular astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Orbscan II topography (Bausch & Lomb) and a flying-spot laser (LaserScan 2000; LaserSight) were used. Epithelial debridement with alcohol was performed before PRK in 16 eyes and transepithelial PRK was performed in 28 eyes. Mean target-induced astigmatism was 8.19 +/- 2.68 diopters (D) and 7.68 +/- 4.50 D in the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 25.4 +/- 13 months. At last postoperative follow-up, 13 (72.2%) and 18 (69.2%) eyes in the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively, had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) better than 20/40. Four (22.2%) and 8 (30.7%) eyes in the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively, had UCVA of 20/20. Fourteen (77.7%) and 18 (69.2%) eyes in the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively, were within 1.00 D of attempted correction in spherical equivalent manifest refraction. No eye lost Snellen lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Mean surgically induced astigmatism was 7.66 +/- 2.70 D and 6.99 +/- 3.80 D for the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively. Index of success of astigmatic correction was 0.138 and 0.137 for the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively. Haze developed in three eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-driven PRK using CIPTA software is a suitable solution for correcting regular and irregular astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a software ablation program (Corneal Interactive Programmed Topographic Ablation [CIPTA]) that provides customized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct astigmatism after keratoplasty. METHODS: In this prospective, noncomparative, consecutive case series, 44 eyes underwent CIPTA for correction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Eighteen eyes were treated for regular astigmatism and 26 eyes were treated for irregular astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Orbscan II topography (Bausch & Lomb) and a flying-spot laser (LaserScan 2000; LaserSight) were used. Epithelial debridement with alcohol was performed before PRK in 16 eyes and transepithelial PRK was performed in 28 eyes. Mean target-induced astigmatism was 8.19 +/- 2.68 diopters (D) and 7.68 +/- 4.50 D in the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 25.4 +/- 13 months. At last postoperative follow-up, 13 (72.2%) and 18 (69.2%) eyes in the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively, had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) better than 20/40. Four (22.2%) and 8 (30.7%) eyes in the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively, had UCVA of 20/20. Fourteen (77.7%) and 18 (69.2%) eyes in the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively, were within 1.00 D of attempted correction in spherical equivalent manifest refraction. No eye lost Snellen lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Mean surgically induced astigmatism was 7.66 +/- 2.70 D and 6.99 +/- 3.80 D for the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively. Index of success of astigmatic correction was 0.138 and 0.137 for the regular and irregular astigmatism groups, respectively. Haze developed in three eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-driven PRK using CIPTA software is a suitable solution for correcting regular and irregular astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.