Literature DB >> 17912589

Is there any prognostically different subgroup among patients with stage IIIC (any TN3M0) breast carcinoma?

Nüvit Duraker1, Zeynep C Caynak, Bakir Bati.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether there are prognostically different subgroups among patients with stage IIIC (any TN3M0) breast carcinoma.
METHODS: The file records of 348 female patients operated for stage IIIC breast carcinoma were reviewed. The endpoint was disease recurrence.
RESULTS: Patients with a T1, T2 or T3 tumor had significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) compared to those with a T4 tumor. In the patient group with T1,2,3N3M0 disease, the DFS was significantly better in patients with between 10 and 15 metastatic axillary lymph nodes, compared to patients with 16 or more metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.0360) and in patients with a nodal ratio ( number of metastatic lymph nodes divided by number of removed nodes) less than or equal to 0.80, compared to patients with a nodal ratio greater than 0.80 (p = 0.0003). In the patient subgroup with between 10 and 15 metastatic lymph nodes, those with a nodal ratio greater than 0.80 had significantly worse DFS, whereas in the patient subgroup with 16 or more metastatic lymph nodes the nodal ratio had no prognostic significance. The DFS of patients with 10 to 15 positive lymph nodes and a nodal ratio of up to 0.80 was significantly better than that of both the patients with 10 to 15 positive lymph nodes and a nodal ratio greater than 0.80 (p = 0.0002), and the patients with 16 or more positive lymph nodes (p = 0.0002); survival of the latter two patient groups was similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T1,2,3N3M0 disease can be divided into prognostically different subgroups according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes in the axilla and the nodal ratio; in this way, different patient subgroups may be offered different treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17912589     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9558-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  7 in total

1.  Factors influencing the outcome of breast cancer patients with 10 or more metastasized axillary lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jun Sang Lee; Seung Il Kim; So Young Choi; Hyung Seok Park; Jong Seok Lee; Seho Park; Jaseung Koo; Byeong-Woo Park; Kyong Sik Lee
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Lymph node ratio may be supplementary to TNM nodal classification in node-positive breast carcinoma based on the results of 2,151 patients.

Authors:  Nüvit Duraker; Bakir Bati; Zeynep Civelek Çaynak; Davut Demir
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Outcomes of locally advanced breast cancer patients with ≥ 10 positive axillary lymph nodes.

Authors:  Emre Koca; Taha Y Kuzan; Omer Dizdar; Taner Babacan; Ilyas Sahin; Erhan Ararat; Kadri Altundag
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Prognostic Significance of the Number of Removed and Metastatic Lymph Nodes and Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Carcinoma Patients with 1-3 Axillary Lymph Node(s) Metastasis.

Authors:  Nüvit Duraker; Bakır Batı; Davut Demir; Zeynep Civelek Caynak
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-10-12

5.  Recursive partitioning analysis of lymph node ratio in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yao-Jen Chang; Kuo-Piao Chung; Li-Ju Chen; Yun-Jau Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Metastatic axillary node ratio predicts recurrence and poor long-term prognosis in patients with advanced stage IIIC (pN3) breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Hee Hur; SeungSang Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Prognostically Distinctive Subgroup in Pathologic N3 Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yun Yeong Kim; Heung Kyu Park; Kyung Hee Lee; Kwan Il Kim; Yong Soon Chun
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.588

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.