Literature DB >> 17912536

Health economic evaluation of ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of liver metastases in colorectal cancer patients.

Lieven Annemans1, Riccardo Lencioni, Hans Warie, Carlo Bartolozzi, Marco Ciceri, Ulrike Müller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to analyze the health economic impact of ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of hepatic colorectal cancer metastases based on observed changes in medical management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision tree simulating a patient's medical management was designed, comparing two scenarios: contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography-based vs ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI-based (Resovist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Germany) diagnosis. A clinical trial in patients with presumed liver metastases (n=36) provided data on clinical decisions regarding the medical management options in relation to diagnostic outcomes: resection, chemotherapy, or best supportive care. A "gold standard" was established afterward, combining all the available clinical, imaging, laboratory, and pathology findings. A multidisciplinary panel formed by a hepatologist, a liver surgeon, and an interventional radiologist decided on the recommended medical management for each patient. Costs of medical resources associated with each management option (all expressed in Euro) were obtained from the public health insurance (average European values). Life expectancies for the different options were obtained from literature.
RESULTS: Despite an initial extra cost of 338 Euro, a significant net saving of 1,443 Euro was obtained with ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI mainly because of avoiding unnecessary surgery. There was no significant difference in the predicted life expectancy between both arms, despite the large difference in medical decision.
CONCLUSION: In this comparative medical decision analysis, it was shown that ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI has the potential to improve medical management and save health care costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17912536     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0350-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

Review 1.  New contrast agents for imaging the liver.

Authors:  T Helmberger; R C Semelka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of liver tumors.

Authors:  Riccardo Lencioni; Dania Cioni; Laura Crocetti; Clotilde Della Pina; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of hepatic metastasectomy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a state-transition Monte Carlo decision analysis.

Authors:  G Scott Gazelle; M G Myriam Hunink; Karen M Kuntz; Pamela M McMahon; Elkan F Halpern; Molly Beinfeld; Jessica S Lester; Kenneth K Tanabe; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Determining transition probabilities: confusion and suggestions.

Authors:  D K Miller; S M Homan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. A practical approach.

Authors:  P Doubilet; C B Begg; M C Weinstein; P Braun; B J McNeil
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Surgery and local treatments of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: how to improve results.

Authors:  C Penna; B Nordlinger
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.360

7.  Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  S M Beard; M Holmes; C Price; A W Majeed
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Detection of malignant hepatic lesions before orthotopic liver transplantation: accuracy of ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Kensaku Mori; Juergen Scheidler; Thomas Helmberger; Nicolaus Holzknecht; Rolf Schauer; Carl Albrecht Schirren; Iris Bittmann; Martin Dugas; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Hepatic tumor imaging using iron oxide MRI: comparison with computed tomography, clinical impact, and cost analysis.

Authors:  J F Schultz; J D Bell; R M Goldstein; J A Kuhn; T M McCarty
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  P C Simmonds; J N Primrose; J L Colquitt; O J Garden; G J Poston; M Rees
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Health-economic evaluation of three imaging strategies in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI vs. extracellular contrast media-enhanced MRI and 3-phase MDCT in Germany, Italy and Sweden.

Authors:  C J Zech; L Grazioli; E Jonas; M Ekman; R Niebecker; S Gschwend; J Breuer; L Jönsson; S Kienbaum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  CorRECTreatment: a web-based decision support tool for rectal cancer treatment that uses the analytic hierarchy process and decision tree.

Authors:  A Suner; G Karakülah; O Dicle; S Sökmen; C C Çelikoğlu
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  Nanomedicine: a primer for surgeons.

Authors:  K K Y Wong; X L Liu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.

Authors:  Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  C J Zech; P Korpraphong; A Huppertz; T Denecke; M J Kim; W Tanomkiat; E Jonas; A Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 6.939

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.