Literature DB >> 17912067

Does the recruitment of excitation and inhibition in the motor cortex differ?

Konrad J Werhahn1, Mehrnousch Behrang-Nia, Michael C Bott, Sven Klimpe.   

Abstract

The level of excitability within the motor cortex can be described as a balance between excitation and inhibition, but it is unknown how well both processes correlate. To address this question, the authors measured motor cortical excitability and inhibition in healthy human subjects, comparing the recruitment of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP) after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Single-pulse "focal" TMS was applied at intensities varying between 90% and 200% of motor thresholds to the right motor cortex of 15 healthy volunteers. The peak-to peak size of MEP responses and the duration of the CSP were measured in small hand muscles. Stimulus-response (S-R) curves were constructed by plotting the MEP size and CSP duration against stimulus intensities. The absolute duration of CSP and the size MEPs correlated significantly and to a similar extent with stimulus intensity (r = 0.60 and 0.53, respectively). The slope of the MEP-S-R was steeper compared with CSP-S-R, particularly at low stimulation intensities. CSP duration saturated earlier and CSP-S-Rs were shifted upwards at a given stimulus intensity compared with MEP-S-Rs. The findings suggest that recruitment of inhibition and excitation within the sensorimotor cortex correlate. However, inhibitory effects are recruited at lower intensities and saturate earlier than excitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17912067     DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181379a69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  8 in total

1.  Effects of lorazepam and baclofen on short- and long-latency afferent inhibition.

Authors:  Claudia V Turco; Jenin El-Sayes; Mitchell B Locke; Robert Chen; Steven Baker; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of tardive syndromes: double randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Eman M Khedr; Bastawy Al Fawal; Ahmed Abdelwarith; Mostafa Saber; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Evidence for normal intracortical inhibitory recruitment properties in cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Rebekah L S Summers; Mo Chen; Colum D MacKinnon; Teresa J Kimberley
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in Clinical Pharmacology.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem       Date:  2008-12

5.  Automated-parameterization of the motor evoked potential and cortical silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher A Rábago; Jack L Lancaster; Shalini Narayana; Wei Zhang; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Modulation of inhibitory corticospinal circuits induced by a nocebo procedure in motor performance.

Authors:  Mehran Emadi Andani; Michele Tinazzi; Nicole Corsi; Mirta Fiorio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies.

Authors:  Lucia M Li; Kazumasa Uehara; Takashi Hanakawa
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.505

8.  Probing the Brain-Body Connection Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): Validating a Promising Tool to Provide Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity and Central Nervous System Function.

Authors:  Arthur R Chaves; Nicholas J Snow; Lynsey R Alcock; Michelle Ploughman
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.