Literature DB >> 17912028

Influence of apoptosis (BCL2, FAS), cell cycle (CCND1) and growth factor (EGF, EGFR) genetic polymorphisms on survival outcome: an exploratory study in squamous cell esophageal cancer.

Meenu Jain1, Shaleen Kumar, Rohit Upadhyay, Puneeta Lal, Anu Tiwari, Uday C Ghoshal, Balraj Mittal.   

Abstract

The study aimed at investigating whether genetic polymorphisms in BCL2, FAS, CCND1, EGF and EGFR genes influence the outcome of patients of esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. Sixty nine histologically confirmed, previously untreated, patients with a squamous cell esophageal cancer were inducted into this study. Genotyping of BCL2 (ala43thr), FAS (A-670G), CCND1 (G870A), EGF (+61A/G) and EGFR (G497A) polymorphisms were determined using the polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism methodology. Genotyped data was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression statistical tests for predicting the survival outcome. Genotypes of BCL2, FAS, CCND1 and EGFR polymorphisms independently did not influence outcome significantly. However, patients with EGF +61AG genotype had median survival of 25.5 months (95% CI = 5.2-45.5), whereas those with EGF +61GG genotype had survival of only 3.7 months (95% CI = 0.0-9.8, p = 0.006). In univariate cox-regression analysis, interaction of genotypes EGF+61GG*radiotherapy tumor dose (< or =50 Gy) and EGF +61GG *upper third tumor location showed high hazard of death, 6.6 (95% CI = 2.0-21.5, p = 0.002) and 26.8 (95% CI = 3.7-194.2, p = 0.001) while EGF+61AG*middle third tumor location had reduced hazard 0.20 (95%CI = 0.06-0.60, p = 0.004). The pilot study suggests that EGF +61AG and +61GG genotypes may predict clinical outcome in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. EGF +61AG genotype was associated with improved survival, however +61GG genotype adversely affected the outcome in patients particularly with upper third location of tumor and lower dose (< or =50) of radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17912028     DOI: 10.4161/cbt.6.10.4709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  12 in total

1.  Role of novel and GWAS originated PLCE1 genetic variants in susceptibility and prognosis of esophageal cancer patients in northern Indian population.

Authors:  Meenakshi Umar; Rohit Upadhyay; Shaleen Kumar; Uday Chand Ghoshal; Balraj Mittal
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-08-21

2.  Role of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma and the suggested mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Yaping Xu; Liming Sheng; Weimin Mao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Prediction of CCND1 amplification using plasma DNA as a prognostic marker in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  H Takeshita; D Ichikawa; S Komatsu; M Tsujiura; T Kosuga; K Deguchi; H Konishi; R Morimura; A Shiozaki; H Fujiwara; K Okamoto; E Otsuji
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  EGFR pathway polymorphisms and bladder cancer susceptibility and prognosis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Mason; Elaine V Morlock; Margaret R Karagas; Karl T Kelsey; Carmen J Marsit; Alan R Schned; Angeline S Andrew
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Pyruvate kinase, muscle isoform 2 promotes proliferation and insulin secretion of pancreatic β-cells via activating Wnt/CTNNB1 signaling.

Authors:  Suijun Wang; Zhen Yang; Ying Gao; Quanzhong Li; Yong Su; Yanfang Wang; Yun Zhang; Hua Man; Hongxia Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-11-01

6.  Association between EGF promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Yan Li; Xueli Wang; Bo Chen; Shan Liu; Yan Wang; Weihong Zhao; Jianqing Wu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  NDRG1 overexpression promotes the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through modulating Wnt signaling pathway.

Authors:  Runna Ai; Yulin Sun; Zhimin Guo; Wei Wei; Lanping Zhou; Fang Liu; Denver T Hendricks; Yang Xu; Xiaohang Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.742

8.  Common genetic variability in ESR1 and EGF in relation to endometrial cancer risk and survival.

Authors:  K Einarsdóttir; H Darabi; K Czene; Y Li; Y L Low; Y Q Li; C Bonnard; S Wedrén; E T Liu; P Hall; J Liu; K Humphreys
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Cyclin D1 G870A polymorphism and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng Li; Weijian Dai; Huanqin Zhou
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-03

10.  Genetic variants of EGF and VEGF predict prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Pei-Wen Yang; Min-Shu Hsieh; Ya-Chuan Huang; Ching-Yueh Hsieh; Tzu-Hsuan Chiang; Jang-Ming Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.