Literature DB >> 17911535

Patient-specific time to peak abdominal organ enhancement varies with time to peak aortic enhancement at MR imaging.

Lisa L Chu1, Bonnie N Joe, Antonio C A Westphalen, Emily M Webb, Fergus V Coakley, Benjamin M Yeh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the relationship between the times to peak enhancement of the liver, pancreas, and jejunum with respect to the time to peak aortic enhancement at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The committee on human research approved this study and waived written informed consent. This study was HIPAA compliant. The study retrospectively identified 141 patients (63 men, 78 women; mean age, 57 years) who underwent abdominal MR imaging by using a test bolus that was monitored approximately every second for 2 minutes with a spoiled gradient-echo T1 transverse section through the upper abdomen. The times to peak enhancement of the aorta, liver, pancreas, and jejunum were recorded and correlated with the time to peak aortic enhancement, age, and sex by means of univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: The mean time to peak aortic enhancement was 21.1 seconds (range, 8.7-41.8 seconds). The times to peak enhancement of the liver, pancreas, and jejunum were positively and linearly correlated with the time to peak aortic enhancement (r = 0.69, 0.86, and 0.80, respectively, all P < .001) and were 3.39, 1.64, and 2.04 times longer than the time to peak aortic enhancement, respectively. Age, sex, and history of heart disease did not give additional predictive information for determining the time to peak visceral enhancement.
CONCLUSION: The times to peak enhancement of the liver, pancreas, and jejunum are linearly related to that of the aorta. These results could potentially allow tailored patient- and organ-specific scan delay optimization at contrast material-enhanced MR image evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17911535     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2451061585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

Review 1.  Contrast medium administration and image acquisition parameters in renal CT angiography: what radiologists need to know.

Authors:  Charbel Saade; Ibrahim Alsheikh Deeb; Maha Mohamad; Hussain Al-Mohiy; Fadi El-Merhi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  64-section multidetector CT of the upper abdomen: optimization of a saline chaser injection protocol for improved vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Antonino Guerrisi; Huiman Barnhart; Sebastian T Schindera; Roberto Passariello; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Opportunities for new CT contrast agents to maximize the diagnostic potential of emerging spectral CT technologies.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; Paul F FitzGerald; Peter M Edic; Jack W Lambert; Robert E Colborn; Michael E Marino; Paul M Evans; Jeannette C Roberts; Zhen J Wang; Margaret J Wong; Peter J Bonitatibus
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 4.  Computed Tomography Techniques, Protocols, Advancements, and Future Directions in Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Naveen M Kulkarni; Alice Fung; Avinash R Kambadakone; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.376

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.