Literature DB >> 17911049

Receiver bias for exaggerated signals in honeybees and its implications for the evolution of floral displays.

Dhruba Naug1, H S Arathi.   

Abstract

Mechanistic models of animal signals posit the occurrence of biases on the part of receivers that could be potentially exploited by signallers. Such biases are most obvious when animals are confronted with exaggerated versions of signals they normally encounter. Signalling systems operating in plant-pollinator interactions are among the most highly coevolved, with plants using a variety of floral signals to attract pollinators. A number of observations suggest that pollinators preferentially visit larger floral displays although the benefit of this to either the plant or the pollinator is not always clear. We use a standard dual-choice experimental protocol to show that honeybees display a receiver bias for exaggerated size and colour contrast--two important components of floral signals--even when such signals do not indicate quality. We discuss the implications of this receiver bias for the evolution of floral displays and its possible exploitation by invading alien plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17911049      PMCID: PMC2391235          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  5 in total

1.  Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior.

Authors:  J Spaethe; J Tautz; L Chittka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Spontaneous flower constancy and learning in honey bees as a function of colour

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Peak shift discrimination learning as a mechanism of signal evolution.

Authors:  Spencer K Lynn; Jonathan Cnaani; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Discrimination of coloured patterns by honeybees through chromatic and achromatic cues.

Authors:  N Hempel de Ibarra; M Giurfa; M Vorobyev
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 1.836

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  FLOBOTS: ROBOTIC FLOWERS FOR BEE BEHAVIOUR EXPERIMENTS.

Authors:  Carla J Essenberg
Journal:  J Pollinat Ecol       Date:  2015

2.  Processing bias: extending sensory drive to include efficacy and efficiency in information processing.

Authors:  Julien P Renoult; Tamra C Mendelson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Floral nectar guide patterns discourage nectar robbing by bumble bees.

Authors:  Anne S Leonard; Joshua Brent; Daniel R Papaj; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Conceptualization of relative size by honeybees.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Daniele d'Amaro; Marita Metzler; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.