Literature DB >> 17909258

Dynamic tracking during intracoronary injection of 18F-FDG-labeled progenitor cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

Brendan Doyle1, Brad J Kemp, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Cynthia Reed, Jeffrey Schmeckpeper, Paul Sorajja, Stephen Russell, Philip Araoz, Stephen J Riederer, Noel M Caplice.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We assessed the feasibility of dynamic 3-dimensional (3D) PET/CT tracking of (18)F-FDG-labeled circulating progenitor cell (CPC) therapy during intracoronary injection, using a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (MI).
METHODS: Human and porcine CPC were radiolabeled with (18)F-FDG, with variation in temperature and incubation time to determine optimal conditions. For in vivo experiments, CPC were harvested before induction of infarction (using 90-min coronary balloon occlusion). At 48 h, animals underwent cardiac MRI to assess infarct size. A balloon catheter was placed in the infarct artery at the same location as that used for induction of MI, and during dynamic 3D PET/CT 3 x 10(7) autologous (18)F-FDG progenitor cells were injected through the central lumen using either (a) 3 cycles of balloon occlusion and reperfusion or (b) high-concentration, single-bolus injection without balloon occlusion (n = 3 for both protocols). Peripheral blood was drawn at 1-min intervals during cell injection.
RESULTS: Labeling efficiency was optimized by 30-min incubation at 37 degrees C (human CPC, 89.9% +/- 4.8%; porcine CPC, 91.6% +/- 6.4%). Cell-bound activity showed a nonsignificant decrease at 1 h (human, 74.3% +/- 10.7%; porcine, 77.7% +/- 12.8%; P > 0.05) and a significant decrease at 2 h (human, 62.1% +/- 8.9%; porcine, 68.6% +/- 5.4%; P = 0.009). Mean infarct size was similar for both injection protocols (16.3% +/- 3.4% and 20.6% +/- 2.7%; P > 0.05). Dynamic scanning demonstrated a sharp rise in myocardial activity during each cycle of balloon-occlusion cell delivery, with a significant fall in activity (around 80%) immediately after balloon deflation. The latter was associated with a transient spike in peripheral blood (18)F-FDG activity, consistent with the first pass of labeled cells in the systemic circulation. A single spike and gradual fall in myocardial activity was observed with high-concentration, single-bolus therapy. At 1 h, myocardial activity was 8.7% +/- 1.5% of total injected dose for balloon-occlusion delivery and 17.8% +/- 7.9% for high-concentration, single-bolus delivery (P = 0.08).
CONCLUSION: Dynamic tracking during intracoronary injection of (18)F-FDG-labeled CPC is feasible and demonstrates significant cell washout from the myocardium immediately after balloon deflation. High-concentration, single-bolus therapy may be as effective as balloon-occlusion delivery. This tracking technique should facilitate development of improved delivery strategies for cardiac cell therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909258     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.042838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  62 in total

Review 1.  Cell delivery routes for stem cell therapy to the heart: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Niall G Campbell; Ken Suzuki
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Labeling and Imaging of Stem Cells - Promises and Concerns.

Authors:  Richard Schäfer
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Stem cell: "KANT" you see it?

Authors:  Michael J Bonios; John V Terrovitis; Maria Roselle Abraham
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Tracking stem cells for cardiovascular applications in vivo: focus on imaging techniques.

Authors:  Yingli Fu; Nicole Azene; Yi Xu; Dara L Kraitchman
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-08-01

Review 5.  Cell tracking and the development of cell-based therapies: a view from the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network.

Authors:  Martin Rodriguez-Porcel; Marvin W Kronenberg; Timothy D Henry; Jay H Traverse; Carl J Pepine; Stephen G Ellis; James T Willerson; Lemuel A Moyé; Robert D Simari
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05

Review 6.  Cell delivery and tracking in post-myocardial infarction cardiac stem cell therapy: an introduction for clinical researchers.

Authors:  Heming Wei; Ting Huay Ooi; Genevieve Tan; Sze Yun Lim; Ling Qian; Philip Wong; Winston Shim
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  In vivo myocardial distribution of multipotent progenitor cells following intracoronary delivery in a swine model of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hung Q Ly; Kozo Hoshino; Irina Pomerantseva; Yoshiaki Kawase; Ryuichi Yoneyama; Yoshiaki Takewa; Annik Fortier; Summer L Gibbs-Strauss; Carrie Vooght; John V Frangioni; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Targeting aldehyde dehydrogenase: a potential approach for cell labeling.

Authors:  Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Haijing Song; Donna Affleck; Darryl L McDougald; Robert W Storms; Michael R Zalutsky; Bennett B Chin
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Tracking cell fate with noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  Gary S Feigenbaum; Louis Lemberg; Joshua M Hare
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Effect of the stop-flow technique on cardiac retention of c-kit positive human cardiac stem cells after intracoronary infusion in a porcine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Matthew C L Keith; Yukichi Tokita; Xian-Liang Tang; Shahab Ghafghazi; Joseph B Moore; Kyung U Hong; Julius B Elmore; Alok R Amraotkar; Haixun Guo; Brian L Ganzel; Kendra J Grubb; Michael P Flaherty; Bathri N Vajravelu; Marcin Wysoczynski; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 17.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.