Literature DB >> 17909211

Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.

Roger Chou1, Laurie Hoyt Huffman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medications are the most frequently prescribed therapy for low back pain. A challenge in choosing pharmacologic therapy is that each class of medication is associated with a unique balance of risks and benefits.
PURPOSE: To assess benefits and harms of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antiepileptic drugs, skeletal muscle relaxants, opioid analgesics, tramadol, and systemic corticosteroids for acute or chronic low back pain (with or without leg pain). DATA SOURCES: English-language studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE (through November 2006) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2006, Issue 4). These electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching reference lists and additional citations suggested by experts. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic reviews and randomized trials of dual therapy or monotherapy with 1 or more of the preceding medications for acute or chronic low back pain that reported pain outcomes, back-specific function, general health status, work disability, or patient satisfaction. DATA EXTRACTION: We abstracted information about study design, population characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events. To grade methodological quality, we used the Oxman criteria for systematic reviews and the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria for individual trials. DATA SYNTHESIS: We found good evidence that NSAIDs, acetaminophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain) are effective for pain relief. The magnitude of benefit was moderate (effect size of 0.5 to 0.8, improvement of 10 to 20 points on a 100-point visual analogue pain scale, or relative risk of 1.25 to 2.00 for the proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant pain relief), except in the case of tricyclic antidepressants (for which the benefit was small to moderate). We also found fair evidence that opioids, tramadol, benzodiazepines, and gabapentin (for radiculopathy) are effective for pain relief. We found good evidence that systemic corticosteroids are ineffective. Adverse events, such as sedation, varied by medication, although reliable data on serious and long-term harms are sparse. Most trials were short term (< or =4 weeks). Few data address efficacy of dual-medication therapy compared with monotherapy, or beneficial effects on functional outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Our primary source of data was systematic reviews. We included non-English-language trials only if they were included in English-language systematic reviews.
CONCLUSIONS: Medications with good evidence of short-term effectiveness for low back pain are NSAIDs, acetaminophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain). Evidence is insufficient to identify one medication as offering a clear overall net advantage because of complex tradeoffs between benefits and harms. Individual patients are likely to differ in how they weigh potential benefits, harms, and costs of various medications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909211     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  133 in total

1.  Worsening trends in the management and treatment of back pain.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Ellen P McCarthy; Roger B Davis; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Reliability of the Path of the Sciatic Nerve, Congruence between Patients' History and Medical Imaging Evidence of Disc Herniation and Its Role in Surgical Decision Making.

Authors:  Keyvan Mostofi; Reza Karimi Khouzani
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Five-year Pain Intensity and Treatment Trajectories of Post-9/11 Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kangwon Song; Chen-Pin Wang; Donald D McGeary; Carlos A Jaramillo; Blessen C Eapen; Megan Amuan; Cindy A McGeary; Jennifer S Potter; Mary Jo Pugh
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 4.  Assessment and management of persistent (chronic) and total wound pain.

Authors:  Kevin Woo; Gary Sibbald; Karsten Fogh; Chris Glynn; Diane Krasner; David Leaper; Jurgen Osterbrink; Patricia Price; Luc Teot
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Limitations of guidelines for low back pain therapy.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Vicki Pennick
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Exercise prescription for chronic back or neck pain: who prescribes it? who gets it? What is prescribed?

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; Timothy S Carey; George M Holmes; Andrea S Wallace; Liana D Castel; Jane D Darter; Anne M Jackman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-02-15

7.  Management of lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint pain.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Frank Je Falco; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18

Review 8.  Medical and psychological risks and consequences of long-term opioid therapy in women.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall; Brett R Stacey; Roger Chou
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Reduction of chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised controlled clinical trial on acupuncture and baclofen.

Authors:  Jalal Zaringhalam; Homa Manaheji; Ali Rastqar; Maryam Zaringhalam
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 5.455

10.  PACE--the first placebo controlled trial of paracetamol for acute low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher M Williams; Jane Latimer; Christopher G Maher; Andrew J McLachlan; Chris W Cooper; Mark J Hancock; Richard O Day; James H McAuley; Chung-Wei Christine Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.