Literature DB >> 17908998

The fuzzy math of solid tumor stem cells: a perspective.

Scott E Kern1, Darryl Shibata.   

Abstract

Apparently effective therapeutic agents very often fail to cure cancer patients. It is therefore attractive to wonder whether a specific resistant cell subset should be recognized and separately targeted. In solid tumors, such as carcinomas, a minor population of "cancer stem cells" has been proposed and sought experimentally in human tumors and isolated cell populations. It is often overlooked that the rationale and supportive data are essentially numerical and can be evaluated as such. A reevaluation of the published studies and related claims within awarded U.S. patents suggests that the mathematical support for the concept of therapeutically useful stem cells is weak and may even invalidate the foundations of these publications and patent claims. Mathematical arguments should be used more consistently, because they can serve as a guide for interpreting studies into cancer stem cells of solid tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17908998     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  35 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: Cancer stem cells and minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Gabriel Ghiaur; Jonathan Gerber; Richard J Jones
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  An orthotopic xenograft model with survival hindlimb amputation allows investigation of the effect of tumor microenvironment on sarcoma metastasis.

Authors:  Seth D Goldstein; Masanori Hayashi; Catherine M Albert; Kyle W Jackson; David M Loeb
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Marker-independent identification of glioma-initiating cells.

Authors:  Virginie Clément; Denis Marino; Cristina Cudalbu; Marie-France Hamou; Vladimir Mlynarik; Nicolas de Tribolet; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Rolf Gruetter; Monika E Hegi; Ivan Radovanovic
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  Cancer stem cells: relevance to clinical transplantation.

Authors:  Gabriel Ghiaur; Jonathan M Gerber; William Matsui; Richard J Jones
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 5.  Tumorigenesis: it takes a village.

Authors:  Doris P Tabassum; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Stem cells and cancer stem-like cells in endocrine tissues.

Authors:  Ricardo V Lloyd; Heather Hardin; Celina Montemayor-Garcia; Fabio Rotondo; Luis V Syro; Eva Horvath; Kalman Kovacs
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.943

7.  A clinically relevant population of leukemic CD34(+)CD38(-) cells in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Gerber; B Douglas Smith; Brownhilda Ngwang; Hao Zhang; Milada S Vala; Laura Morsberger; Steven Galkin; Michael I Collector; Brandy Perkins; Mark J Levis; Constance A Griffin; Saul J Sharkis; Michael J Borowitz; Judith E Karp; Richard J Jones
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Disruption of a Quorum Sensing mechanism triggers tumorigenesis: a simple discrete model corroborated by experiments in mammary cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Zvia Agur; Yuri Kogan; Liora Levi; Hannah Harrison; Rebecca Lamb; Oleg U Kirnasovsky; Robert B Clarke
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 9.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-11-18

Review 10.  Keeping an open mind: highlights and controversies of the breast cancer stem cell theory.

Authors:  Mansi Shah; Cinzia Allegrucci
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2012-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.