Literature DB >> 17908846

The use of compound topical anesthetics: a review.

Neal D Kravitz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The author reviewed the history of, federal regulations regarding, risks of and adverse drug reactions of five compound topical anesthetics: tetracaine, adrenaline/epinephrine and cocaine (TAC); lidocaine, adrenaline/epinephrine and tetracaine (LET); lidocaine, tetracaine and phenylephrine (TAC 20 percent Alternate); lidocaine, prilocaine and tetracaine (Profound); and lidocaine, prilocaine, tetracaine and phenylephrine with thickeners (Profound PET). TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The author reviewed clinical trials, case reports, descriptive articles, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and recent public advisory warnings regarding the federal approval of and risks associated with the use of compound topical anesthetics.
RESULTS: Compound topical anesthetics are neither FDA-regulated nor -unregulated. Some compounding pharmacies bypass the new FDA drug approval process, which is based on reliable scientific data and ensures that a marketed drug is safe, effective, properly manufactured and accurately labeled. Two deaths have been attributed to the lay use of compound topical anesthetics. In response, the FDA has announced the strengthening of its efforts against unapproved drug products. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Compound topical anesthetics may be an effective alternative to local infiltration for some minimally invasive dental procedures; however, legitimate concerns exist in regard to their safety. Until they become federally regulated, compound topical anesthetics remain unapproved drug products whose benefits may not outweigh their risks for dental patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17908846     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  8 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy of 2 topical anesthetics for the placement of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices.

Authors:  Derek S Reznik; Arthur H Jeske; Jung-Wei Chen; Jeryl English
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2009

Review 2.  Pain management via local anesthetics and responsive hydrogels.

Authors:  Kyle R Bagshaw; Curt L Hanenbaum; Erica J Carbone; Kevin W H Lo; Cato T Laurencin; Joseph Walker; Lakshmi S Nair
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2015-02

3.  Comparative Study of Compounded Anesthetic Benzocaine/Lidocaine/Tetracaine (BLT) Cream with and without Abrasive Particles.

Authors:  Metavee Boonsiri; Deanna Diaz; Theerayuth Sukmee; Joyce Okawa; Chérie M Ditre
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2017-04

4.  The effectiveness of Oraqix versus TAC(a) for placement of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices.

Authors:  Thomas S Kwong; Budi Kusnoto; Grace Viana; Carla A Evans; Keiko Watanabe
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  An update on local anesthesia for pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  Faizal C Peedikayil; Ajoy Vijayan
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 Jan-Apr

Review 6.  Recent advances in topical anesthesia.

Authors:  Hyo-Seol Lee
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-12-31

7.  Effect of epinephrine on the absorption of lidocaine following application to the oral mucosa in rats.

Authors:  Rui Sasaki; Katsuhisa Sunada
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Topical anesthesia for stainless steel crown tooth preparation in primary molars: a pilot study.

Authors:  Krishnan Padminee; R Hemalatha; P Shankar; D Senthil; Gnanabagyan J Trophimus
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-08-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.