J Wasson1, L Pearce, T Alun-Jones. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK. josephwasson@hotmail.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The ENT emergency clinic provides an important out-patient service; however, often, no correspondence is sent to the general practitioner. AIM: To conduct a general practitioner questionnaire audit in order to assess whether a standardised, computerised clinic letter template could improve communication between the ENT emergency clinic and patients' general practitioners. STANDARD: All ENT emergency clinic patients should have a summary letter sent to their general practitioner. METHODS: One hundred general practitioner questionnaires were enclosed with the first 100 ENT emergency clinic template letters sent to patients' general practitioners. RESULTS: Seventy-two general practitioners responded (72 per cent). Of these respondents, only 7 per cent had previously received regular correspondence from the ENT emergency clinic before the introduction of the computerised letter template. Following its implementation, such a letter was sent to 100 per cent of the clinic patients' general practitioners. Ninety-seven per cent of the general practitioners valued the template letter, with a mean satisfaction score of 8.4 on a 10-point scale. Eighty-six per cent of the general practitioners stated that they would not prefer a dictated letter. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a simple, computerised clinic letter template improves communication with ENT emergency clinic patients' general practitioners.
INTRODUCTION: The ENT emergency clinic provides an important out-patient service; however, often, no correspondence is sent to the general practitioner. AIM: To conduct a general practitioner questionnaire audit in order to assess whether a standardised, computerised clinic letter template could improve communication between the ENT emergency clinic and patients' general practitioners. STANDARD: All ENT emergency clinic patients should have a summary letter sent to their general practitioner. METHODS: One hundred general practitioner questionnaires were enclosed with the first 100 ENT emergency clinic template letters sent to patients' general practitioners. RESULTS: Seventy-two general practitioners responded (72 per cent). Of these respondents, only 7 per cent had previously received regular correspondence from the ENT emergency clinic before the introduction of the computerised letter template. Following its implementation, such a letter was sent to 100 per cent of the clinic patients' general practitioners. Ninety-seven per cent of the general practitioners valued the template letter, with a mean satisfaction score of 8.4 on a 10-point scale. Eighty-six per cent of the general practitioners stated that they would not prefer a dictated letter. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a simple, computerised clinic letter template improves communication with ENT emergency clinic patients' general practitioners.
Authors: Arjun H Rash; Robert Sheldon; Maoliosa Donald; Cindy Eronmwon; Vikas P Kuriachan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Annette J Berendsen; Annegriet Kuiken; Wim H G M Benneker; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Theo B Voorn; Jan Schuling Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-08-08 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: P Vermeir; D Vandijck; S Degroote; R Peleman; R Verhaeghe; E Mortier; G Hallaert; S Van Daele; W Buylaert; D Vogelaers Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Stephanie Medlock; Juliette L Parlevliet; Danielle Sent; Saeid Eslami; Marjan Askari; Derk L Arts; Joost B Hoekstra; Sophia E de Rooij; Ameen Abu-Hanna Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.240