Literature DB >> 17908346

Improving correspondence to general practitioners regarding patients attending the ENT emergency clinic: a regional general practitioner survey and audit.

J Wasson1, L Pearce, T Alun-Jones.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ENT emergency clinic provides an important out-patient service; however, often, no correspondence is sent to the general practitioner. AIM: To conduct a general practitioner questionnaire audit in order to assess whether a standardised, computerised clinic letter template could improve communication between the ENT emergency clinic and patients' general practitioners. STANDARD: All ENT emergency clinic patients should have a summary letter sent to their general practitioner.
METHODS: One hundred general practitioner questionnaires were enclosed with the first 100 ENT emergency clinic template letters sent to patients' general practitioners.
RESULTS: Seventy-two general practitioners responded (72 per cent). Of these respondents, only 7 per cent had previously received regular correspondence from the ENT emergency clinic before the introduction of the computerised letter template. Following its implementation, such a letter was sent to 100 per cent of the clinic patients' general practitioners. Ninety-seven per cent of the general practitioners valued the template letter, with a mean satisfaction score of 8.4 on a 10-point scale. Eighty-six per cent of the general practitioners stated that they would not prefer a dictated letter.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of a simple, computerised clinic letter template improves communication with ENT emergency clinic patients' general practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17908346     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215107000746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  5 in total

1.  Valued Components of a Consultant Letter from Referring Physicians' Perspective: a Systematic Literature Synthesis.

Authors:  Arjun H Rash; Robert Sheldon; Maoliosa Donald; Cindy Eronmwon; Vikas P Kuriachan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey.

Authors:  Annette J Berendsen; Annegriet Kuiken; Wim H G M Benneker; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Theo B Voorn; Jan Schuling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  How the relationships between general practitioners and intensivists can be improved: the general practitioners' point of view.

Authors:  Bérengère Etesse; Samir Jaber; Thibault Mura; Marc Leone; Jean-Michel Constantin; Pierre Michelet; Lana Zoric; Xavier Capdevila; François Malavielle; Bernard Allaouchiche; Jean-Christophe Orban; Pascale Fabbro-Peray; Jean-Yves Lefrant
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations.

Authors:  P Vermeir; D Vandijck; S Degroote; R Peleman; R Verhaeghe; E Mortier; G Hallaert; S Van Daele; W Buylaert; D Vogelaers
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  An email-based intervention to improve the number and timeliness of letters sent from the hospital outpatient clinic to the general practitioner: A pair-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephanie Medlock; Juliette L Parlevliet; Danielle Sent; Saeid Eslami; Marjan Askari; Derk L Arts; Joost B Hoekstra; Sophia E de Rooij; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.