| Literature DB >> 17907879 |
Piers D L Howe1, Hersh Sagreiya, Dwight L Curtis, Chengjie Zheng, Margaret S Livingstone.
Abstract
Recently, a double-anchoring theory (DAT) of lightness perception was proposed (P. Bressan, 2006), which offers explanations for all the data explained by the original anchoring theory (A. Gilchrist et al., 1999), as well as a number of additional lightness phenomena. Consequently, DAT can account for an unprecedented range of empirical results, potentially explaining everything from the basic simultaneous contrast display to subtle variations of the Gelb effect. In this comment, the authors raised 4 concerns that demonstrate serious theoretical and empirical difficulties for DAT. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17907879 PMCID: PMC2635063 DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.1105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Rev ISSN: 0033-295X Impact factor: 8.934