Literature DB >> 17907867

On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.

Nicholas Epley1, Adam Waytz, John T Cacioppo.   

Abstract

Anthropomorphism describes the tendency to imbue the real or imagined behavior of nonhuman agents with humanlike characteristics, motivations, intentions, or emotions. Although surprisingly common, anthropomorphism is not invariant. This article describes a theory to explain when people are likely to anthropomorphize and when they are not, focused on three psychological determinants--the accessibility and applicability of anthropocentric knowledge (elicited agent knowledge), the motivation to explain and understand the behavior of other agents (effectance motivation), and the desire for social contact and affiliation (sociality motivation). This theory predicts that people are more likely to anthropomorphize when anthropocentric knowledge is accessible and applicable, when motivated to be effective social agents, and when lacking a sense of social connection to other humans. These factors help to explain why anthropomorphism is so variable; organize diverse research; and offer testable predictions about dispositional, situational, developmental, and cultural influences on anthropomorphism. Discussion addresses extensions of this theory into the specific psychological processes underlying anthropomorphism, applications of this theory into robotics and human-computer interaction, and the insights offered by this theory into the inverse process of dehumanization. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17907867     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  109 in total

1.  Character studies.

Authors:  Ming Hsu; Adrianna C Jenkins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Young children's preference for unique owned objects.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Natalie S Davidson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-07-07

3.  Approaching an understanding of omniscience from the preschool years to early adulthood.

Authors:  Jonathan D Lane; Henry M Wellman; E Margaret Evans
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2014-08-25

4.  A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.

Authors:  Ewart J de Visser; Samuel S Monfort; Kimberly Goodyear; Li Lu; Martin O'Hara; Mary R Lee; Raja Parasuraman; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 5.  Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: a multimotive model.

Authors:  Laura Smart Richman; Mark R Leary
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY.

Authors:  John T Cacioppo; Gary G Berntson; Jean Decety
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2010

7.  How Can I Connect with Thee: Measuring and Comparing Satisfaction in Multiple Relationship Domains.

Authors:  Louise C Hawkley; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  J Individ Psychol (1998)       Date:  2010

8.  Folk explanations of behavior: a specialized use of a domain-general mechanism.

Authors:  Robert P Spunt; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-24

9.  Believers' estimates of God's beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people's beliefs.

Authors:  Nicholas Epley; Benjamin A Converse; Alexa Delbosc; George A Monteleone; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  How Self-Construals Affect Responses to Anthropomorphic Brands, With a Focus on the Three-Factor Relationship Between the Brand, the Gift-Giver and the Recipient.

Authors:  Chien-Huang Lin; Yidan Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.