OBJECTIVE: There is concern that patients included in trials do not represent the true patient population and women in particular may selectively be excluded. We looked at trial data submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) by drug companies to achieve marketing authorization in Europe between 2000 and 2003. METHODS: We reviewed the EMEA database and included the main studies for the risk/benefit assessment (pivotal trials) submitted between 2000 and 2003. RESULTS: In pivotal trials submitted to the EMEA there was no, or generally clinically negligible, evidence for gender bias; however, women were underrepresented in hypertension, diabetes and hepatitis B trials, and overrepresented in rheumatoid arthritis and allergic conjunctivitis. CONCLUSIONS: In trials submitted for marketing authorization to the EMEA gender bias was not a serious problem.
OBJECTIVE: There is concern that patients included in trials do not represent the true patient population and women in particular may selectively be excluded. We looked at trial data submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) by drug companies to achieve marketing authorization in Europe between 2000 and 2003. METHODS: We reviewed the EMEA database and included the main studies for the risk/benefit assessment (pivotal trials) submitted between 2000 and 2003. RESULTS: In pivotal trials submitted to the EMEA there was no, or generally clinically negligible, evidence for gender bias; however, women were underrepresented in hypertension, diabetes and hepatitis B trials, and overrepresented in rheumatoid arthritis and allergic conjunctivitis. CONCLUSIONS: In trials submitted for marketing authorization to the EMEA gender bias was not a serious problem.